Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed

Validity of the FACIT-Sp to Assess Spiritual Well-Being in Elderly Patients

¹ Service of Geriatric Medicine & Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
² Service of Geriatric Medicine & Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
³ Chaplaincy Service, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
⁴ Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
⁵ Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
⁶ Service of Geriatric Medicine & Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
⁷ Service of Geriatric Medicine & Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne Medical Center (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland

Psychology·Volume 06 (2015)·Pages 1311–1322·Published 5 August 2015·DOI10.4236/psych.2015.610128

Abstract

Among instruments measuring spiritual well-being, the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp-12) is the most widely used instrument in research. It has been validated in patients suffering from cancer or HIV/AIDS, but has rarely been used in elderly patients. The objectives of this study were to determine the psychometric properties and suitability of the FACIT-Spto assess spiritual well-being in hospitalized elderly patients. This cross-sectional study uses a mixed method approach. Subjects were patients (N = 208), aged 65 years and older, consecutively admitted in post-acute rehabilitation. Psychometric properties of the FACIT-Sp were investigated. The internal structure of the FACIT-Sp (factor structure and internal consistency) was assessed. Convergent validity of the FACIT-Sp was assessed using the Spiritual Distress Assessment Tool (SDAT), the question “Are you at peace?” and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Predictive validity was assessed using length of stay (LOS) and discharge destination. Understanding and interpretation of FACIT-Sp items were consecutively assessed in a sub-sample of 135 patients. Results show that FACIT-Sp scores ranged from 7 to 46 (mean 29.6 ± 7.8); 23.1% of the patients had high spiritual well-being. Cronbach’s α was good (0.85). Item-to-total correlations were all significant (0.34 to 0.73). Principal component analyses performed with 2 or 3 factors were only moderately consistent with previous work. FACIT-Sp correlated with SDAT, “Are you at peace?” and GDS (Rho = -0.45, P < 0.001; 0.51, P < 0.001 and -0.38, P < 0.001). No association was found with LOS or discharge destination. Spontaneous comments about one or more FACIT-Sp items were made by 97/135 (71.9%). Specifically, items that address purpose and meaning in life were frequently found difficult to answer. Analyses suggest that the FACIT-Sp may underestimate spiritual well-being in older patients. In conclusion, despite having acceptable psychometric properties, the FACIT-Sp presents limitations for measurement of spiritual well-being in hospitalized elderly patients.

KeywordsSpiritualitySpiritual Well-BeingPsychometricsElderlyQuality of Life

Astrow, A. B., Wexler, A., Texeira, K., He, M. K., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2007). Is Failure to Meet Spiritual Needs Associated with Cancer Patients’ Perceptions of Quality of Care and Their Satisfaction with Care? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 5753-5757. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.4362
Bekelman, D. B., Parry, C., Curlin, F. A., Yamashita, T. E., Fairclough, D. L., & Wamboldt, F. S. (2010). A Comparison of Two Spirituality Instruments and Their Relationship with Depression and Quality of Life in Chronic Heart Failure. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39, 515-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.08.005
Boyle, P. A., Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2010). Purpose in Life Is Associated with a Reduced Risk of Incident Disability among Community-Dwelling Older Persons. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 1093-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181d6c259
Brady, M. J., Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Mo, M., & Cella, D. (1999). A Case for including Spirituality in Quality of Life Measurement in Oncology. Psycho-Oncology, 8, 417-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199909/10)8:5 3.0.CO;2-4
Canada, A. L., Murphy, P. E., Fitchett, G., Peterman, A. H., & Schover, L. R. (2008). A 3-Factor Model for the FACIT-Sp. Psychooncology, 17, 908-916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.1307
Carpenito, M. (2004). Nursing Diagnosis: Application to Clinical Practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Chandler, C. K., Holden, J. M., & Kolander, C. A. (1992). Counseling for Spiritual Wellness: Theory and Practice. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 168-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb02193.x
Daaleman, T. P., & Frey, B. B. (2004). The Spirituality Index of Well-Being: A New Instrument for Health-Related Quality-of-Life Research. Annals of Family Medicine, 2, 499-503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.89
Daaleman, T. P., Frey, B. B., Wallace, D., & Studenski, S. A. (2002). The Spirituality Index of Well-Being: Development and Testing of a New Measure. Journal of Family Practice, 51.
Daaleman, T. P., Kuckelman, C. A., & Frey, B. B. (2001). Spirituality and Well-Being: An Exploratory Study of the Patient Perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1503-1511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00439-1
Davison, S. N., & Janghri, G. S. (2013). The Relationship between Spirituality, Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 45, 170-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.019

Menu

Menu

Menu

Validity of the FACIT-Sp to Assess Spiritual Well-Being in Elderly Patients

Abstract

References (45)