Coordination of brain activity, in the form of modulation of feedforward activity by stored information and expectations, occurs across domains of perception and cognition. A reliable and compelling example of this is size contrast in vision. This paper builds on a prior study to show that in healthy humans, the spread of activation in striate and extrastriate visual cortex during a context-modulated size perception task is dependent on the perceived size of the target image, not on the physical size of the retinal image. These data provide further evidence that early regions in visual cortex are modulated by top-down influences, and provide a framework for investigating visual context processing in psychiatric disorders where reduced sensitivity to visual contextual effects has been demonstrated in behavioral tasks.
KeywordsfMRISize PerceptionContrastVisual IllusionMental Health
Angelucci, A., Levitt, J. B., Walton, E. J. S., Hupe, J.-M., Bullier, J., & Lund, J. S. (2002). Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 8633-8646.
Arnold, D. H., Birt, A., & Wallis, T. S. (2008). Perceived Size and Spatial Coding. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 5954-5958. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0578-08.2008
Carlson, T. A., Ritchie, J. B., Kriegeskorte, N., Durvasula, S., & Ma, J. (2014). Reaction Time for Object Categorization Is Predicted by Representational Distance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 132-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00476
Corlett, P. R., Frith, C. D., & Fletcher, P. C. (2009). From Drugs to Deprivation: A Bayesian Framework for Understanding Models of Psychosis. Psychopharmacology, 206, 515-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00213-009-1561-0
Corlett, P. R., Honey, G. D., Krystal, J. H., & Fletcher, P. C. (2011). Glutamatergic Model Psychoses: Prediction Error, Learning, and Inference. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 294-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npp.2010.163
Damaraju, E., Huang, Y. M., Barrett, L. F., & Pessoa, L. (2009). Affective Learning Enhances Activity and Functional Connectivity in Early Visual Cortex. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2480-2487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.04.023
de Haas, B., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Anderson, E. J., & Rees, G. (2014). Perceptual Load Affects Spatial Tuning of Neuronal Populations in Human Early Visual Cortex. Current Biology, 24, R66-R67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.061
Doherty, M. J., Campbell, N. M., Tsuji, H., & Phillips, W. A. (2010). The Ebbinghaus Illusion Deceives Adults but Not Children. Developmental Science, 13, 714-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00931.x
Doherty, M. J., Tsuji, H., & Phillips, W. A. (2008). The Context Sensitivity of Visual Size Perception Varies across Cultures. Perception, 37, 1426-1433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5946
Fang, F., Boyaci, H., Kersten, D., & Murray, S. O. (2008). Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1. Current Biology, 18, 1707-1712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.025
Freeman, E., Sagi, D., & Driver, J. (2001). Lateral Interactions between Targets and Flankers in Low-Level Vision Depend on Attention to the Flankers. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1032-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn728
Friston, K., Rotshtein, P., Geng, J. J., Sterzer, P., & Henson, R. N. (2006). A Critique of Functional Localisers. Neuroimage, 30, 1077-1087. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.012
Gilbert, C., Ito, M., Kapadia, M., & Westheimer, G. (2000). Interactions between Attention, Context and Learning in Primary Visual Cortex. Vision Research, 40, 1217-1226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00234-5
Hu, K., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2013). Interactions between Reward and Threat during Visual Processing. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1763-1772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.025
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002). Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images. Neuroimage, 17, 825-841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1132
Kaas, J. H. (2000). Why Is Brain Size So Important: Design Problems and Solutions as Neocortex Gets Bigger or Smaller. Brain and Mind, 1, 7-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010028405318
Kanai, R., & Rees, G. (2011). The Structural Basis of Inter-Individual Differences in Human Behaviour and Cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 231-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn3000
Keane, B. P., Silverstein, S. M., Wang, Y., & Papathomas, T. V. (2013). Reduced Depth Inversion Illusions in Schizophrenia Are State-Specific and Occur for Multiple Object Types and Viewing Conditions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 506-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032110
Keil, A., Bradley, M. M., Ihssen, N., Heim, S., Vila, J., Guerra, P., & Lang, P. J. (2010). Defensive Engagement and Perceptual Enhancement. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3580-3584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.007
Kret, M. E., & de Gelder, B. (2010). Social Context Influences Recognition of Bodily Expressions. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 169-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2220-8
Li, W., Piech, V., & Gilbert, C. D. (2008). Learning to Link Visual Contours. Neuron, 57, 442-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.011
Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The Representation of Perceived Angular Size in Human Primary Visual Cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1641
Ni, A. M., Murray, S. O., & Horwitz, G. D. (2014). Object-Centered Shifts of Receptive Field Positions in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex. Current Biology, 24, 1653-1658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.003
Open Science, C. (2015). PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science. Science, 349, Article ID: aac4716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Papathomas, T. V., & Bono, L. M. (2004). Experiments with a Hollow Mask and a Reverspective: Top-Down Influences in the Inversion Effect for 3-D Stimuli. Perception, 33, 1129-1138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p5086
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics Software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
Peirce, J. W. (2008). Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy. Front Neuroinform, 2, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
Phillips, W. A., Clark, A., & Silverstein, S. M. (2015). On the Functions, Mechanisms, and Malfunctions of Intracortical Contextual Modulation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 52, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.010
Phillips, W. A., & Silverstein, S. M. (2003). Convergence of Biological and Psychological Perspectives on Cognitive Coordination in Schizophrenia. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 65-82; Discussion 82-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000025
Pooresmaeili, A., Arrighi, R., Biagi, L., & Morrone, M. C. (2013). Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Size Adaptation Illusion. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 15999-16008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1770-13.2013
Reddy, L., & Kanwisher, N. (2006). Coding of Visual Objects in the Ventral Stream. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 408-414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.004
Ritchie, J. B., Tovar, D. A., & Carlson, T. A. (2015). Emerging Object Representations in the Visual System Predict Reaction Times for Categorization. PLoS Computational Biology, 11, e1004316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004316
Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. (2013). Subjective Size Perception Depends on Central Visual Cortical Magnification in Human v1. PLoS ONE, 8, e60550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060550
Schwarzkopf, D. S., Song, C., & Rees, G. (2011). The Surface Area of Human V1 Predicts the Subjective Experience of Object Size. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 28-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2706
Shipley, W., Gruber, C., Martin, T., & Klein, M. (2009). Shipley Institute of Living Scale-2. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Silverstein, S. M., Hatashita-Wong, M., Schenkel, L. S., Wilkniss, S., Kovacs, I., Feher, A. et al. (2006). Reduced Top-Down Influences in Contour Detection in Schizophrenia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 11, 112-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546800444000209
Silverstein, S. M., & Keane, B. P. (2009). Perceptual Organization in Schizophrenia: Plasticity and State-Related Change. Learning and Perception, 1, 229-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/LP.1.2009.2.111
Silverstein, S. M., & Keane, B. P. (2011). Perceptual Organization Impairment in Schizophrenia and Associated Brain Mechanisms: Review of Research from 2005 to 2010. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37, 690-699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbr052
Silverstein, S. M., Keane, B. P., Wang, Y., Mikkilineni, D., Paterno, D., Papathomas, T. V., & Feigenson, K. (2013). Effects of Short-Term Inpatient Treatment on Sensitivity to a Size Contrast Illusion in First-Episode Psychosis and Multiple-Episode Schizophrenia. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00466
Silverstein, S. M., Knight, R. A., Schwarzkopf, S. B., West, L. L., Osborn, L. M., & Kamin, D. (1996). Stimulus Configuration and Context Effects in Perceptual Organization in Schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 410-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.105.3.410
Smith, S. M. (2002). Fast Robust Automated Brain Extraction. Human Brain Mapping, 17, 143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10062
Song, C., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. (2013). Variability in Visual Cortex Size Reflects Tradeoff between Local Orientation Sensitivity and Global Orientation Modulation. Nature Communications, 4, 2201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3201
Tootell, R. B., Hadjikhani, N. K., Vanduffel, W., Liu, A. K., Mendola, J. D., Sereno, M. I., & Dale, A. M. (1998). Functional Analysis of Primary Visual Cortex (V1) in Humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 811-817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.811
Uhlhaas, P. J., Phillips, W. A., Mitchell, G., & Silverstein, S. M. (2006). Perceptual Grouping in Disorganized Schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 145, 105-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.016
Uhlhaas, P. J., Phillips, W. A., & Silverstein, S. M. (2005). The Course and Clinical Correlates of Dysfunctions in Visual Perceptual Organization in Schizophrenia during the Remission of Psychotic Symptoms. Schizophrenia Research, 75, 183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2004.11.005
Vetter, P., & Newen, A. (2014). Varieties of Cognitive Penetration in Visual Perception. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 62-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.04.007
Wilson, H. R., & Wilkinson, F. (2015). From Orientations to Objects: Configural Processing in the Ventral Stream. Journal of Vision, 15, 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.7.4
Woolrich, M. W., Ripley, B. D., Brady, M., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Temporal Autocorrelation in Univariate Linear Modeling of FMRI Data. Neuroimage, 14, 1370-1386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0931
Zhang, N. R., & Von der Heydt, R. (2010). Analysis of the Context Integration Mechanisms Underlying Figure-Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 6482-6496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5168-09.2010
Zhu, M., & Rozell, C. J. (2013). Visual Nonclassical Receptive Field Effects Emerge from Sparse Coding in a Dynamical System. PLoS Computational Biology, 9, e1003191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003191