Pursue goals and dreams throughout life are important to maintain an active life and enjoy it, which turns out to be a mechanism where people adapt to the challenges of the age, also if they are able to use their resources to continue growing as people, all should contribute to a better quality of life. Therefore the aim is to test the predictive value of subjective well-being, their dimensions: purpose in life and personal growth on quality of life of older adults from different entities of Mexico. For that, 582 elderly (mean age = 70.3, SD = 7.5) were individually interviewed, also they answered with their consent informed, the questionnaire Quality of Life (QoL) (WHOQOL-OLD) and the Ryff’s Scale of Subjective Well-Being (SW) with two of its dimensions: Purpose in Life (PiL) and Personal Growth (PG). The results show statistically significant correlations between QoL and PiL ( r = .565, p < .0001), QoL and PG ( r = .442, p < .0001), and QoL and SW ( r = .633, p < .0001). Also the resulting linear regression model with significant coefficients is: PiL ( β = 0.134, p < .038), PG ( β = -0.138, p < .025) and SW ( β = 0.632, p < .0001), value F (3,423) = 99.28, p < .0001 and coefficient R 2 = .413. It is concluded that the purpose in life, personal growth and well-being are predicting a better quality of life of older adults.
KeywordsWell-BeingPurpose in LifePersonal GrowthQuality-of-LifeElders
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Successful Aging: Perspectives from the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baltes, P., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. (2006). Lifespan Theory in Developmental Psychology. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of Childpsychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development (pp. 569-595). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). Thequality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satis- factions. Russel Sage Foundation, New York: Wiley.
Carstensen, L. L., Rosenberger, M. E., Smith, K., & Modrek, S. (2015). Optimizing Health in Aging Societies. Public Policy & Aging Report, Advance Online Publication.
Carstensen, L. L., Turan, B., Scheibe, S., Ram, N., Ersner-Hershfield, H., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Brooks, K. P., & Nessel- roade, J. R. (2011). Emotional Experience Improves with Age: Evidence Based on over 10 Years of Experience Sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021285
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and Well-Being: Anintroduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1
Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., & van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Adaptación espanola de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18, 572-577.
Diener, E. (1994). El bienestar subjetivo. Intervención Psicosocial, 3, 67-113.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. The American Psychologist, 55, 34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress. Psycho- logical Bulletin, 125, 276-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2007). Toward a Theory of Successful Ageing: Selection, Optimization, and Compensation. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Geropsychology: European Perspectives for an Ageing World (pp. 239-254). Cam- bridge: Hogrefe and Huber,.
Godoy-Izquierdo, D., Martínez, A., & Godoy, J. F. (2008). La escala de Balance-Afectivo. Propiedades psicometricas de un instrumento para la medida del afecto positivo y negativo en población espanola. Clinica y Salud, 19, 157-189.
González-Celis, A. L., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2013). Quality of Life in the Elderly: Psychometric Properties of the WHOQ- OL-OLD Module in Mexico. Health, 5, 110-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/health.2013.512A015
Grossbaum, M. F., & Bates, G.W. (2002). Correlates of Psychological Well-Being at Midlife: The Role of Generativity, Agency and Communion, and Narrative Themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 120-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000654
Harper, A., & Power, M. (1998). Development of theWorld Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assess- ment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798006667
Keyes, C., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. (2002). Optimizing Well-Being: The Empirical Encounter of Two Traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007-1022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant Validity of Well-Being Measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616
Power, M., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S., & WHOQOL-OLD Group (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2197-2214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9
Rocke, C., & Brose, A. (2013). Intraindividual Variability and Stability of Affect and Well-Being: Short-Term and Long-Term Change and Stabilization Processes. GeroPsychology, 26, 185-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000094
Rocke, C., Li, S.-C., & Smith, J. (2009). Intraindividual Variability in Positive and Negative Affect over 45 Days: Do Older Adults Fluctuate Less than Young Adults? Psychology and Aging, 24, 863-878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016276
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). To Be Happy or to Be Self-Fulfilled: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaemonic Well-Being. In S. Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 141-166), Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, C. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069-1081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2008). Know Thyself and Become What You Are: A Eudaimonic Approach to Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 13-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
Van Dierendonck, D. (2004). The Construct Validity of Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-Being and Its Extension with Spiritual Well-Being. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 629-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00122-3
Veenhoven, R. (1994). El estudio de la satisfacción con la vida. Intervención Psicosocial, 3, 87-116.
Vera-Villarroel, P., Urzúa, M. A., Silva, J. R., Pavez, P., & Celis-Atenas, K. (2013). Escala de bienestar de Ryff: análisis comparativo de los modelos teóricos en distintos grupos de edad. Psicologia: Reflexao e Crítica, 26, 106-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722013000100012