Accurately recognizing others’ faces is very important for living successfully in the society. However, we often fail to recognize them. What causes such a problem? Numerous psychological studies reported that the performance of facial recognition was influenced by prior mental activities, so-called carry-over effect. It is considered that mental activities have two types of processing style, global processing and local processing. Global processing refers to attend the general meaning of an event. Local processing refers to attend to elements themselves. Recent studies showed that prior mental activities requiring local processing interfered with face recognition. However, it is still controversial whether or not this interference on recognition occurs only in face recognition. Here, in order to investigate if face is special for recognition, we conducted the experiments in which participants were required a prior mental activity and a following recognition task. As the prior mental activity, we used an imagination task in which participants were asked to imagine a faraway place (global processing) or a nearby place (local processing). The face and the scene picture recognition tasks were used as recognition tasks. Our results showed that the accuracy of face recognition after imagining the nearby place was worse than that after imagining the faraway place. Additionally, the same pattern was observed for scene picture recognition. The results suggest that local processing at the imagination task was carried over into not only face recognition but also scene recognition, and that local processing harmed these recognition tasks.
KeywordsCarry-Over EffectGlobal/Local ProcessingFace PerceptionConstrual Level Theory
Behrmann, M., Avidan, G., Marotta, J. J., & Kimchi, R. (2005). Detailed Exploration of Face-Related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1130-1149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/0898929054475154
Bouvet, L., Rousset, S., Valdois, S., & Donnadieu, S. (2011). Global Precedence Effect in Audition and Vision: Evidence for Similar Cognitive Styles across Modalities. Acta Psychologica, 138, 329-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.08.004
Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. (2002). Verbal Overshadowing of Multiple Face and Car Recognition: Effects of Within- versus Across-Category Verbal Descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 183-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.861
Cassia, V. M., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., Bricolo, E., & Turati, C. (2008). Holistic Processing for Faces and Cars in Preschool- Aged Children and Adults: Evidence from the Composite Effect. Developmental Science, 12, 236-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00765.x
Curby, K. M., Glazek, K., & Gauthier, I. (2009). A Visual Short-Term Memory Advantage for Objects of Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 94-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.94
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). The Reliability of Eyewitness Identification: The Role of System and Estimator Variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 223-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01044644
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1977). Developmental Changes in the Representation of Faces. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 23, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(77)90069-8
Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). The Rate of False Source Attributions Depends on How Questions Are Asked. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 541-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1422968
Forster, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). How Global versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x
Gao, Z., Flevaris, A. V., Robertson, L. C., & Bentin, S. (2011). Priming Global and Local Processing of Composite Faces: Revisiting the Processing-Bias Effect on Face Perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1477-1486. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0109-7
Gauthier, I., & Logothetis, N. K. (2000). Is Face Recognition Not So Unique after All? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 125- 142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026432900380535
Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00286-6
Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for Cars and Birds Recruits Brain Areas Involved in Face Recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/72140
Hills, P., & Lewis, M. B. (2007).Temporal Limitation of Navon Effect on Face Recognition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 501-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.2.501-509
Hills, P., & Lewis, M. B. (2008). Testing Alternatives to Navon Letters to Induce a Transfer-Inappropriate Processing Shift in Face Recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 561-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440701728524
Hills, P., & Lewis, M. B. (2009). A Spatial Frequency Account of the Detriment That Local Processing of Navon Letters Has on Face Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1427-1442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015788
Hine, K., & Itoh, Y. (2014). Carry-Over Effects in Face Recognition: Processing Mode or Attentional Window? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 98-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.845193
Hine, K., Nouchi, R., & Itoh, Y. (2011). Influence of Subjective Difficulty on the Degree of Configural and Featural Processing in Face Recognition. Japanese Psychological Research, 53, 246-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00468.x
Hunt, C., & Carroll, M. (2008). Verbal Overshadowing Effect: How Temporal Perspective may Exacerbate or Alleviate the Processing Shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1352
Itoh, Y., Sasaki, R., Hisamatsu, T., Tachi, M., Chin, J., & Schooler, J. (2009). The Verbal Overshadowing Effect in Memory for Pictures. In S. Watanabe (Ed.), CARLS Series of Advanced Study of Logic and Sensibility (pp. 233-246). Tokyo: Keio University.
Laughery, K. R., Alexander, J. F., & Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of Human Face: Effects of Target Exposure Time, Target Position, and Type of Photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 460-496.
Lawson, R. (2007). Local and Global Processing Biases Fail to Influence Face, Object, and Word Recognition. Visual Cognition, 15, 710-740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280601112519
Lewis, M. B., Mills, C., Hills, P. J., & Weston, N. (2009). Navon Letters Affect Face Learning and Face Retrieval. Experimental Psychology, 56, 258-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.258
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now. Science, 322, 1201-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958
Macrae, C. N., & Lewis, H. L. (2002). Do I Know You? Processing Orientation and Face Recognition. Psychological Science, 13, 194-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00436
Melcher, J. M., & Wchooler, J. W. (2004). Perceptual and Conceptual Training Mediate the Verbal Overshadowing Effect in an Unfamiliar Domain. Memory & Cognition, 32, 618-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195853
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before the Trees: The Precedence of Global Features in Visual Perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
Perfect, T. J. (2003). Local Processing Bias Impairs Lineup Performance. Psychological Reports, 93, 393-394.
Perfect, T. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2007). The Effects of Local and Global Processing Orientation on Eyewitness Identification Performance. Memory, 15, 784-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658210701654627
Perfect, T. J., Weston, N. J., Dennis, I., & Snell, A. (2008). The Effects of Precedence on Navon-Induced Processing Bias in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1479-1486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210802034678
Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and the Criminal Justice System. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01044385
Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization Produces a Transfer Inappropriate Processing Shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.930
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The Cognitive Functions of Linguistic Categories in Describing Persons: Social Cognition and Language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.558
Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (1999). Revisiting the Past and Back to the Future: Memory Systems and the Linguistic Representation of Social Events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 877-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.877
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640749308401045
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal Construal and Time-Dependent Changes in Preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
Westerman, D. L., & Larsen, J. D. (1997). Verbal-Overshadowing Effect: Evidence for a General Shift in Processing. The American Journal of Psychology, 110, 417-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1423566
Weston, N. J., Perfect, T. J., Schooler, J. W., & Dennis, I. (2008). Navon Processing and Verbalisation: A Holistic/Featural Distinction. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 587-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440701728557
Wickham, L. H., & Lander, K. (2008). The Effect of Verbal Description and Processing Type on Face Identification. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 577-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440701728433
Wyer, N. A., Perfect, T. J., & Pahl, S. (2010). Temporal Distance and Person Memory: Thinking about the Future Changes Memory for the Past. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 805-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210370965
Xu, Y., Liu, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2005). The M170 Is Selective for Faces, Not for Expertise. Neuropsychologia, 43, 588-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.016
Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational Information in face Perception. Perception, 16, 747-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/p160747