Transition Daze: A Qualitative Analysis of Transition Days in Blended Families
- 1 Department of Sociology, California State University, Los Angeles, USA
- 2 Department of Sociology, California State University, Los Angeles, USA
Abstract
The current research enhances the understanding of transition day for researchers and clinicians who focus on marriage and family issues. A qualitative study involving 13 members (parents) of various stages of stepfamily development and demographics, is assessed. Interviews included questions for parents in a blended family and focused transitional day specific questions. By gaining a more in-depth understanding of transitional days in stepfamilies, immediate assistance may be provided to families who encounter difficulties during various stages of stepfamily/blended family formation. Useful approaches for current stepfamilies and future stepfamilies are discussed. Lastly, a new term is coined by the authors: “Transition Daze”.
- Bamberg, M. (2012). Narrative Analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology (3 Volumes). Washington DC: APA Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13620-006
- Browning, S., & Artelt, E. (2012). Stepfamily Therapy: The 10 Steps. American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13089-003
- Burck, C. (2005). Comparing Qualitative Research Methodologies for Systemic Research: The Use of Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis and Narrative Analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 27, 237-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00314.x
- Cherlin, A. J. (2010). The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today. Random House Digital, Inc.
- Downes, R. D. K. R. (2009). Transitions and Family Systems.
- Friedlander, M. L., Wildman, J., Heatherington, L., & Skowron, E. A. (1994). What We Do and Don’t Know about the Process of Family Therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.390
- Frosh, S., Burck, C., Strickland-Clark, L., & Morgan, K. (1996). Engaging with Change: A Process Study of Family Therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 18, 141-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.1996.tb00041.x
- Gehart, D. R., Ratliff, D. A., & Lyle, R. R. (2001). Qualitative Research in Family Therapy: A Substantive and Methodological Review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 261-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb01162.x
- Helmeke, K. B., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2000). Clients’ Perceptions of Pivotal Moments in Couple Therapy: A Qualitative Study of Change in Therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 469-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00317.x
- Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2003). For Better or for Worse: Divorce Reconsidered. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Kogan, S. M. (1998). The Politics of Making Meaning: Discourse Analysis of “Postmodern” Interview. Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 229-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00085
- Kogan, S. M., & Gale, J. E. (1997). Decentering Therapy: Textual Analysis of a Narrative Therapy Session. Family Process, 36, 101-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1997.00101.x
- L’Abate, L. (1976). Understanding and Helping the Individual in the Family. New York: Grune & Stratton.
- L’Abate, L. (1986). Systematic Family Therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.