Elderly People Benefit More from Positive Feedback Based on Their Reactions in the Form of Facial Expressions during Human-Computer Interaction — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Elderly People Benefit More from Positive Feedback Based on Their Reactions in the Form of Facial Expressions during Human-Computer Interaction
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
,
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
,
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
,
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
1 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
2 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
3 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
4 Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
In this brief report, we present the results of our investigation into the impact of age on reactions in the form of facial expressions to positive and negative feedback during human-computer interaction. In total, 30 subjects were analyzed after a video-recorded mental task in the style of a Wizard of Oz scenario. All subjects and their facial reactions were coded using the Facial Expression Coding System (FACES). To summarize briefly, we can conclude from our facial expression analysis that compared with their younger counterparts, elderly people show significantly lower levels of negative expression in response to positive feedback from the technical system (“Your performance is improving!”). This result indicates that elderly people seem to benefit more from praise during interaction than younger people, which is significant for the design of future companion technologies.
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
Burriss, L., Powell, D. A., & White, J. (2007). Psychophysiological and Subjective Indices of Emotion as a Function of Age and Gender. Cognition & Emotion, 21, 182-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930600562235
Calvo, R., & D’Mello, S. (2010). Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 1, 18-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2010.1
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Manual for the Facial Action Code. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2003). Unmasking the Face. A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Clues. Los Altos, CA: Malor Books.
Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (2002). Facial Action Coding System. Manual and Investigator’s Guide, Salt Lake City, UT: Research Nexus.
Fölster, M., Hess, U., & Werheid, K. (2014). Facial Age Affects Emotional Expression Decoding. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00030
Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8, 23-34.
Isaacowitz, D. M., & Riediger, M. (2011). When Age Matters: Developmental Perspectives on “Cognition and Emotion”. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 957-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.561575
Isaacowitz, D. M., Toner, K., Goren, D., & Wilson, H. R. (2008). Looking While Unhappy Mood-Congruent Gaze in Young Adults, Positive Gaze in Older Adults. Psychological Science, 19, 848-853. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02167.x
Kächele, M., Rukavina, S., Palm, G., Schwenker, F., & Schels, M. (2015) Paradigms for the Construction and Annotation of Emotional Corpora for Real-World Human-Computer-Interaction. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods (ICPRAM) (pp 367-373). SciTePress. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0005282703670373
Kreisler, H. (2004). Paul Ekman Interview: Conversations with History. Institute of International Studies, UC Berkeley. http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people4/Ekman/ekman-con3.html
Kring, A., & Sloan, D. (2007). The Facial Expression Coding System (FACES): Development, Validation, and Utility. Psychological Assessment, 19, 210-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.2.210
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and Motivated Cognition: The Positivity Effect in Attention and Memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 496-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pentland, A. S. (2010). To Signal Is Human. American Scientist, 98, 204-219.
Picard, R. W. (1995). Affective Computing. M.I.T Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 321.
Reed, A. E., & Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The Theory behind the Age-Related Positivity Effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 339. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339
Rukavina, S., Gruss, S., Hoffman, H., & Traue, H. C. (2016a). Facial Expression Reactions to Feedback in a Human-Computer Interaction—Does Gender Matter? Psychology, 7, 356-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.73038
Rukavina, S., Gruss, S., Hoffmann, H., Tan, J.-W., Walter, S., & Traue, H. C. (2016b). Affective Computing and the Impact of Gender and Age. PLoS ONE, 11, Article ID: e0150584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150584
Rukavina, S., Gruss, S., Walter, S., Hoffmann, H., & Traue, H. C. (2015). OPEN_EmoRec_II—A Multimodal Corpus of Human-Computer Interaction. International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, 9, 977-983.
Russel, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1977). Evidence for a Three-Factor Theory of Emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 273-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X
Storch, M., & Tschacher, W. (2014). Embodied Communication—Kommunikation beginnt im Körper, nicht im Kopf. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Tan, J.-W., Andrade, A. O., Li, H., Walter, S., Hrabal, D., Rukavina, S. et al. (2016). Recognition of Intensive Valence and Arousal Affective States via Facial Electromyographic Activity in Young and Senior Adults. PLoS ONE, 11, Article ID: e0146691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146691
Traue, H. C., Kessler, H., & Deighton, R. W. (2016). Emotional Inhibition. In G. Fink (Ed.), Stress: Concepts, Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior (pp. 233-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800951-2.00028-5
Traue, H. C., Ohl, F., Brechman, A., Schwenker, F., Kessler, H., Limbrecht, K. et al. (2013). A Framework for Emotions and Dispositions in Man-Companion Interaction. In M. Rojc, & N. Campbell (Eds.), Converbal Synchrony in Human-Machine Interaction (pp. 99-140). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b15477-6
Walter, S., Scherer, S., Schels, M., Glodek, M., Hrabal, D., Schmidt, M. et al. (2011). Multimodal Emotion Classification in Naturalistic User Behavior. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human-Computer Interaction: Towards Mobile and Intelligent Interaction Environments (Volume Part 3, pp. 603-611). Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21616-9_68
Wendemuth, A., & Biundo, S. (2012). A Companion Technology for Cognitive Technical Systems. In A. Esposito, A. M. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, R. Hoffmann, & V. C. Müller (Eds.), Cognitive Behavioural Systems (pp. 89-103). Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34584-5_7