It has been shown that individuals with a growth mindset for learning see mistakes as opportunities to learn and improve, whereas for fixed-minded individuals mistakes indicate lack of ability. Earlier empirical research on mindsets includes both quantitative surveys and qualitative approaches with observations and stimulated recall method. During performance monitoring it is possible to probe event-related brain potentials (ERPs), enabling the investigation of the neural basis of students’ different reactions to mistakes. ERP studies have shown that growth mindset is associated with an enhancement of the error positivity (Pe), an ERP reflecting awareness of and attention allocation to mistakes. More growth-minded individuals also show superior accuracy after mistakes compared to those endorsing more of a fixed mindset. Most importantly, Pe amplitude mediates the relationship between mindset and post-error accuracy. These results suggest that neural activity indexing online awareness of and attention to mistakes is intimately involved in growth-minded individuals’ ability to rebound from mistakes. In this article we review and connect educational, psychological and neuroscientific points of view to investigate the role of mindsets related to learning.
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the Effects of Stereotype Threat on African American College Students by Shaping Theories of Intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2001.1491
Bartholow, B. D., Pearson, M. A., Dickter, C. L., Sher, K. J., Fabiani, M., & Gratton, G. (2005). Strategic Control and Medial Frontal Negativity: Beyond Errors and Response Conflict. Psychophysiology, 42, 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00258.x
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay Dispositionism and Implicit Theories of Personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 Component a Manifestation of Context Updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00058027
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House Publishing Group.
Dweck, C. S. (2009). Who Will the 21st-Century Learners Be? Knowledge Quest, 38, 8-9.
Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets and Human Nature: Promoting Change in the Middle East, the Schoolyard, the Racial Divide, and Willpower. American Psychologist, 67, 614-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0029783
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgements and Reactions: A World from Two Perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
Endrass, T., Franke, C., & Kathmann, N. (2005). Error Awareness in a Saccade Countermanding Task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 275-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.275
Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of Crossmodal Divided Attention on Late ERP Components: II. Error Processing in Choice Reaction Tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9
Frank, M. J., D’Lauro, C. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Cross-Task Individual Differences in Error Processing: Neural, Electrophysiological, and Genetic Components. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 297-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.7.4.297
Gehring, W. J., Liu, Y., Orr, J. M., & Carp, J. (2012). The Error-Related Negativity (ERN/Ne). In S. J. Luck, & E. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components (pp. 231-291). New York: Oxford University Press.
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the Pipeline: Stereotype Threat and Woman’s Achievement in High-Level Math Courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29, 17-28.
Hajcak, G., McDonald, N., & Simons, R. F. (2003). To Err Is Autonomic: Error-Related Brain Potentials, ANS Activity, and Post-Error Compensatory Behavior. Psychophysiology, 40, 895-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00107
Herrmann, M. J., Rerrman, J., Ehlis, A., Heidrich, A., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2004). Source Localization (LORETA) of the Error-Related-Negativity (ERN/Ne) and Positivity (Pe). Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 294-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.013
Hong, Y., Chiu, C., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit Theories, Attributions and Coping: A Meaning System Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the Intentions of Others with One’s Own Mirror Neuron System. PLoS Biology, 3, e79.
Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2009). Our Bodies, Our Minds, Our Selves: Social Neuroscience and Its Application to Education. In S. Feifer, & G. Rattan (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Emotional Disorders (pp. 15-22). Middletown, MD: School Neuropsychology Press.
Klein, T. A., Ullsperger, M., & Danielmeier, C. (2013). Assessing Error Awareness without Relying on Introspective Judgment? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00113
Kujala, T., & Näätänen, R. (2010). The Adaptive Brain: A Neurophysiological Perspective. Progress in Neurobiology, 91, 55-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.01.006
Laming, D. (1979). Choice Reaction Performance Following an Error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-X
Luck, S. (2005). An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mangels, J., Butterfiels, B., Lamb, J., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2006). Why Do Beliefs about Intelligence Influence Learning Success? A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Model. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1, 75-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl013
Moser, J. S., Schroder, H. S., Heeter, C., Moran, T. P., & Lee, Y. H. (2011). Mind Your Errors: Evidence for a Neural Mechanism Linking Growth Mind Set to Adaptive Post-Error Adjustments. Psychological Science, 22, 1484-1489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611419520
Murphy, P. R., Robertson, I. H., Allen, D., Hester, R., & O’Connell, R. G. (2012). An Electrophysiological Signal That Precisely Tracks the Emergence of Error Awareness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00065
Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Blom, J., Band, G. P., & Kok, A. (2001). Error-Related Brain Potentials Are Differentially Related to Awareness of Response Errors: Evidence from an Antisaccade Task. Psychophysiology, 38, 752-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3850752
Overbeek, T. J. M., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Dissociable Components of Error Processing: On the Functional Significance of the Pe Vis-à-Vis the ERN/Ne. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 319-329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.319
Paunesku, D. (2013). Scaled-Up Social Psychology: Intervening Wisely and Broadly in Education. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford, CA: Stanford University. https://web.stanford.edu/~paunesku/paunesku_2013.pdf
Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and Error Correction in Choice-Response Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022853
Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It’s Ok—Not Everyone Can Be Good at Math”: Instructors with Entity Theory Comfort (and Demotivate) Students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and Macro-Adjustments of Task Set: Activation and Suppression in Conflict Tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ramautar, J. R., & Wijnen, J. G. (2009). To PE or Not to PE: A P3-Like ERP Component Reflecting the Processing of Response Errors. Psychophysiology, 46, 531-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00790.x
Robins, L. R. W., & Pals, J. (2002). Implicit Self-Theories in the Academic Domain: Implications for Goal Orientation, Attributions, Affect, and Self-Esteem Change. Self and Identity, 1, 313-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805
Schroder, H. S., Moran, T. P., Donnellan, M. B., & Moser, J. S. (2014). Mindset Induction Effects on Cognitive Control: A Neurobehavioral Investigation. Biological Psychology, 103, 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.08.004
Steinhauser, M., & Yeung, N. (2010). Decision Processes in Human Performance Monitoring. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 15643-15653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1899-10.2010
Tirri, K., & Nokelainen, P. (2010). The Influence of Self-Perception of Abilities and Attribution Styles on Academic Choices: Implications for Gifted Education. Roeper Review, 33, 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530204
van Atteveldt, N., Fernandez, I., de Vries Lentsch, C., & Krabbendam, L. (2015). The Relevance of Mindsets for Education: Mindset Influences Post-Error Adjustments on a Math Task. Paper Presented at the 16th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI), Limassol, Cyprus. http://www.earli2015.org/media/EARLI2015/docs/EARLI2015_bookOfAbstracts.pdf
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805
Yeager, D. S., & Walton, G. M. (2011). Social-Psychological Interventions in Education: They’re Not Magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311405999
Yeager, D., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). An Implicit Theory of Personality Intervention Reduces Adolescent Aggression in Response to Victimization and Exclusion. Child Development, 84, 970-988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12003
Yeager, D., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tirri, K., Nokelainen, P., & Dweck, C. S. (2011). Adolescents’ Implicit Theories Predict Desire for Vengeance after Remembered and Hypothetical Peer Conflicts. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1090-1107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023769