Influences of Attachment Style, Family Functions and Gender Differences on Loneliness in Japanese University Students
- 1 Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Okayama, Japan
- 2 Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Okayama, Japan
- 3 Takahashi, Okayama, Japan
- 4 Manaboshi Clinic, Okayama, Japan
Abstract
Psychological studies of loneliness are comparatively new. This study examined influences of attachment style, family functions and gender differences on loneliness in Japanese university students. The following questionnaires were administered: University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale, Internal Working Model Scale for assessing attachment, and Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale III. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were employed to examine relationships between loneliness as the dependent variable, and gender, attachment style and family functions as independent variables. Results showed that gender differences significantly influenced loneliness. Furthermore, loneliness was positively influenced by avoidant and ambivalent attachment styles and negatively influenced by stable attachment style and family cohesion. A significant interaction was also observed between secure attachment style and family cohesion. These results indicated that a stable attachment style might reduce loneliness. On the other hand, in spite of an unstable attachment style, loneliness can be decreased if family cohesion is high.
- Ainsworth, M., & Bell, S. (1970). Attachment, Exploration, and Separation: Illustrated by the Behavior of One-Year-Olds in a Strange Situation. Child Development, 41, 49-67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127388
- Baek, Y., Bae, Y., & Jang, H. (2013). Social and Parasocial Relationships on Social Network Sites and Their Differential Relationships with Users’ Psychological Well-Being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 512-517. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0510
- Blos, P. (1967). The Second Individuation Process of Adolescence. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 162-186.
- Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment: Attachment and Loss Volume One. New York: Basic Books.
- Brennan, T., &Auslander, N. (1979). Adolescent Loneliness: An Exploration Study of Social and Psychological Pre-dispositions and Theory. Boulder, CO: Behavioral Research Institute.
- Fujimori, A., Yamazaki, T., Sato, M., Hayashi, H., Fujiwara, Y., & Matsusaka, T. (2015). Study on Influence of Internal Working Models and Gender Differences on Addiction of Social Network Sites in Japanese University Students. Psychology, Special Issues, Research on Applied Psychology, 6, 1832-1840. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.614179
- Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and Sex Differences in Perceptions of Networks of Personal Relationships. Child Development, 63, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130905
- Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
- Hirosawa, T. (2002). The Influences of Loneliness and Tolerance to Aloneness on Feelings and Coping Behaviors When Lonely. Kansai University of International Studies, 3, 81-96.
- Jacobs, J. (1971). Adolescent Suicide. New York: Wiley.
- John, E., & John. C. (1999). Lonely Hearts: Psychological Perspectives on Loneliness. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(99)80008-0
- Kusada, H. (1995). The Reliability and Validity of FACES Ⅲ for Japanese. Japanese Journal of Counseling Science, 28, 154-162.
- Larson, R. W., Richards, M. H., Moneta, G., Holmbeck, G., & Duckett, E. (1996). Changes in Adolescents’ Daily Interactions with Their Families from Ages 10 to 18: Disengagement and Transformation. Developmental Psychology, 32, 744-754. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.4.744