The Effect of Ambivalence Online Review on Consumer Purchasing Intention
- 1 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- 2 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
Online review has been playing an important role in consumer decision making and enterprise marketing recently. This study focuses on two important issues. Firstly, how the ambivalence online review change consumer decision-making and purchase intension from the point view of different types of ambivalence online review. Secondly, how consumer of different involvement degree interprets the ambivalence online review of consumer decision. Finally, the following conclusions are obtained through the empirical study: 1) When the review about product functional attribute is positive, inter-attribute ambivalence is more significant for consumer’s purchasing intension, compared with intra-attribute ambivalence. When the review about product hedonic attribute is positive, intra-attribute ambivalence is more significant to consumer’s purchasing intension, compared with inter-attribute ambivalence. 2) The degree of consumer involvement has a moderating effect on the relationship between product attributes and type of ambivalence and consumer purchasing intention. When the review about product functional attribute is positive, inter-attribute ambivalence is more significant to consumer’s purchasing intension, compared with intra-attribute ambivalence of high level of consumer involvement. In contrast, intra-attribute ambivalence is more significant to consumer’s purchasing intension, compared with inter-attribute ambivalence for high level of consumer involvement. When the review about product enjoyment attribute is positive, intra-attribute ambivalence is more significant in consumer’s purchasing intension, compared with inter-attribute ambivalence of high low of consumer involvement, thus there are no different between intra-attribute ambivalence and inter-attribute ambivalence for low level of consumer involvement.
- Arndt, J. (1967). Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 291-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3149462
- Baker, M. J., & Churchill, G. A. (1977). The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 538-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151194
- Batra, S. K., Ghosh, T. K., & Barker, R. L. (1990). The Bending Behaviour of Plain-Woven Fabrics Part III: The Case of Bilinear Thread-Bending Behaviour and the Effect of Fabric Set. Journal of the Textile Institute, 81, 272-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405009008658710
- Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and Functional Positioning of Brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769810202664
- Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362. https://doi.org/10.1086/209118
- Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
- Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do Online Reviews Matter?—An Empirical Investigation of Panel Data. Decision Support Systems, 45, 1007-1016.
- Filieri, R. (2014). What Makes Online Reviews Helpful? A Diagnosticity Adoption Framework to Explain Information and Normative Influences in E-WOM. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1261-1270.
- Herry, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility Diagnosticity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462. https://doi.org/10.1086/208570
- Holbrook, M. B. (1978). Beyond Attitude Structure: Toward the Informational Determinants of Attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 15, 545-556. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150624
- Hupfer, N. T., & Gardner, D. M. (1971). Differential Involvement with Products and Issues: An Exploratory Study (pp. 262-270). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
- Jin, L. (2007). Determinants of Customer’s Complaint Intention: Model and Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Retail Trade. Nankai Business Review, 10, 38-46.
- Kamins, M. A., & Assael, H. (1987). Two-Sided versus One-Sided Appeals: A Cognitive Perspective on Argumentation, Source Derogation, and the Effect of Disconfirming Trial on Belief Change. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 29-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151751