The Impact of Object Complexity on Visual Working Memory Capacity
- 1 Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- 2 The Institute of Enterprise Development, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
- 3 Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Abstract
The capacity of visual working memory (VWM) is regarded as one of the central themes in working memory. Related studies-on cognitive psychology and neuroscience level focused on the flexibility of capacity of working memory and the influencing factors. The current study aimed at the relationship of object complexity and VWM capacity, which used change detection paradigm in order to reveal the mechanism of object representation in visual working memory. We explored the impact of complexity on capacity of VWM by different-complexity-level Snodgrass line drawings. Participants were required to remember 2, 3 or 5 objects at the same time. In experiment 1, we set the initial stimulus exposure time at 500 ms to investigate the complexity effect. Then we varied the duration of the initial stimulus exposure time to 250 ms, 750 ms to rule out perception constraint and the test the time course of the complexity effect. We found that the middle-level-complexity object had the best performance which could be named as “middle complexity effect”. This effect was not the result restrained by the perception and disappeared when the exposure time was prolonged to 750 ms.
- Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory Is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x
- Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2008). Visual Short-Term Memory Operates More Efficiently on Boundary Features than It Does on Surface Features. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 346-364.
- Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working Memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Cao, L. R., & Li, Y. M. (2005).The Influence of Figures Complexity on Visual Search. In The tenth National Psychology Conference (p. 234).
- Cao, X. H., Lin, L. B., & Liu, Z. J. (2005). The Influence of Figures Complexity and Cognitive Style to the Performance of Visual Search. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 11, 8-10. (In Chinese)
- Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K. et al. (1997). Transient and Sustained Activity in a Distributed Neural System for Human Working Memory. Nature, 386, 608-611. https://doi.org/10.1038/386608a0
- Cowan, N. (2001). The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
- Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The Capacity of Visual Working Memory for Features and Conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846
- Shu, H., Cheng, Y. S., & Zhang, H. C. (1989). A Standardized Set of 235 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity and Visual Complexity. Acta Psychology Sinica, 21, 389-396. (In Chinese)
- Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., Koeppe, R. A. et al. (1995). Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1995.7.3.337
- Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A Standardized Set of 260 Pictures: Norms for Name Agreement, Image Agreement, Familiarity, and Visual Complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
- Song, J. H., & Jiang, Y. H. (2006). Visual Working Memory for Simple and Complex Features—An fMRI Study. Neuroimage, 30, 963-972.