Why Do Students Who Are Eligible to Enter University Fall into Academic Probation and What Possibilities Are There for Effective Interventions?
- 1 Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
- 2 University of Applied Labour Studies of the Federal Employment Agency (HdBA), Mannheim, Germany
- 3 Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
- 4 Career and Talent Management Association, Istanbul, Turkey
- 5 Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
- 6 Applied Vocational Psychology and Policy Research Unit (AVOPP), Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Abstract
Probation is the academic status of students who do not meet minimum academic criteria of Grade Point Average (GPA) as specified by the university. Probation furthermore restricts the amount of credits that can be loaded. It is a growing problem with many different causes. It has been studied for many years with e.g. The Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ) consists of four subscales that are social adjustment, personal-emotional adjustment, academic adjustment and institutional attachment (Gerdes & Mallinckrodt, 1994). In 2014, Istanbul Technical University (ITU) Dean of Student and Registrar’s Office published the General Statistical Evaluation Report highlighting the issue of academic probation. In this study the authors aimed to identify the reasons of academic probation and to set up an intervention model at the University Career Centre. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews and group discussions were conducted with 182 undergraduate academic probation students from 13 faculties. Data analysis using Qualitative Data Analysis Software (MAXQDA) was used to identify the reasons for academic probation. Once the reasons had been identified, existing tools were improved and new tools were developed. After the implementation of various intervention measures such as promoting career summits, setting up a web portal, informing the administration of the university of the importance and necessity of creating open areas, the results were analysed. At the end of a two-year period of strenuous efforts, the effectiveness of those measures was evident as the probation rate had dropped from 23.46% to 17.08% (ITU Dean of Student and Registrar’s Office, 2014, 2016).
- Ahmed, J. U., Chowdhury, M. K., Rahman, S., & Talukder, A. H. (2014). Academic Probation: An Empirical Study of Private University Students. Research in Education, 92, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.0001
- Aspelmeier, J. E., Love, M. M., McGill, L. A., Elliott, A. N., & Pierce, T. W. (2012). Self-Esteem, Locus of Control, College Adjustment, and GPA among First- and Continuing-Generation Students: A Moderator Model of Generational Status. Research in Higher Education, 53, 755-781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9252-1
- Astin, A. W. (1984). Student Involvement: A Developmental Theory for Higher Education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.
- Bodvarsson, Ö. B., & Walker, R. L. (2004). Do Parental Cash Transfers Weaken Performance in College? Economics of Education Review, 23, 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.11.009
- Boyer, S. P., & Sedlacek, W. E. (1988). Noncognitive Predictors of Academic Success for International Students: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 218-223.
- Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O. D., & Navarro, L. (2003). The Effective Use of Student Time: A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Case Study. Economics of Education Review, 22, 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00027-X
- Dunwoody, P. T., & Frank, M. L. (1995). Why Students Withdraw from Classes. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 553-558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1995.9914927
- Gerdes, H., & Mallinckrodt, B. (1994). Emotional, Social, and Academic Adjustment of College Students: A Longitudinal Study of Retention. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1994.tb00935.x
- Gray, R., Vitak, J., Easton, E. W., & Ellison, N. B. (2013). Examining Social Adjustment to College in the Age of Social Media: Factors Influencing Successful Transitions and Persistence. Computers & Education, 67, 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.021
- Heisserer, D. L., & Parette, P. (2002). Advising at Risk Students in College and University Settings. College Student Journal, 36, 69-83.
- ITU (n.d.). From Past to Future. http://www.itu.edu.tr/en/about-itu/general/general-information
- ITU Dean of Student and Registrar’s Office (2014). General Statistical Evaluation Report.
- ITU Dean of Student and Registrar’s Office (2016). General Statistical Evaluation Report.