Decreasing greenhouse gas emissions (climate change mitigation) is one of the most important types of pro-environmental behavior. Greenhouse gases have been repeatedly cited as a leading cause of climate change (CC). However, before engaging in CC mitigation behaviors, individuals must accept the reality of CC. Few studies addressing the influence of individual time perspective on climate change mitigation have been found. No study investigating the relationship between time perspectives and acceptance of the reality of CC exists. This study was aimed at filling that research gap. The study examines the impact of consideration of immediate and distant consequences of behavior on individual acceptance of the reality of CC and commitment to engage in CC mitigation behaviors. Two-hundred-and-forty-five undergraduate students responded to an instrument investigating those variables. A structural-equation model revealed that consideration of distant consequences affects acceptance of CC, but considering immediate consequences do not influence that acceptance. Accepting that CC is real affects the commitment to act pro-environmentally, which in turn influences CC mitigation commitment. Consideration of distant consequences also positively affects willingness to engage in CC mitigation; yet, consideration of immediate consequences produced no effect on that commitment.
Adams, J. (2012). Consideration of Immediate and Future Consequences, Smoking Status, and Body Mass Index. Health Psychology, 31, 260-263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025790
Arnocky, S., Milfont, T., & Nicol, J. (2014). Time Perspective and Sustainable Behavior. Environment & Behavior, 46, 556-582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512474987
Bain, P., Milfont, T., Kashima, Y., Bilewicz, M., Doron, G., Garearsdóttir, R., Gouveia, V., Guan, Y., Johansson, L., Pasquali, C., Corral-Verdugo, V. et al. (2016). Co-Benefits of Addressing Climate Change Can Motivate Action around the World. Nature Climate Change, 6, 154-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2990
Bentler, P.M. (2006). EQS, Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
Broomell, S., Budescu, D., & Por, H. (2015). Personal Experience with Climate Change Predicts Intentions to Act. Global Environmental Change, 32, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.001
Brüger, A., Morton, T., & Dessai, S. (2015). Hand in Hand: Public Endorsement of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Plos One, 10, e0124843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124843
Cameron, L. D., Brown, P. M., & Chapman, J. G. (1998). Social Value Orientations and Decisions to Take Proenvironmental Action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 675-697. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01726.x
Charlton, S. R., Gossett, B. D., & Charlton, V. A. (2011). Beyond the Shadow of a Trait: Understanding Discounting through Item-Level Analysis of Personality Scales. Psychological Record, 61, 583-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395778
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., & Green, S. et al. (2013). Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming in the Scientific Literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024
Corral-Verdugo, V., & Figueredo, A. J. (1999). Convergent and Divergent Validity of Three Measures of Conservation Behavior: The Multitrait-Multimethod Approach. Environment & Behavior, 31, 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972353
Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Pinheiro, J. Q. (2006). Sustainable Behavior and Time Perspective: Present, Past, and Future Orientations and Their Relationship with Water Conservation Behavior. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 40, 139-147.
Crowley, T. J. (2000). Causes of Climate Change over the Past 1000 Years. Science, 289, 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5477.270
Ebreo, A., & Vining, J. (2001). How Similar Are Recycling and Waste Reduction? Future Orientation and Reasons for Reducing Waste as Predictors of Self-Reported Behavior. Environment & Behavior, 33, 424-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973061
Gatersleben, B., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2002). Measurement and Determinants of Environmentally Significant Consumer Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034003004
Howe, P. D., & Leiserowitz, A. R. (2013). Who Remembers a Hot Summer or a Cold Winter? The Asymmetric Effect of Beliefs about Global Warming on Perceptions of Local Seasonal Climate Conditions in the U.S. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1488-1500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014
Joireman, J., Kees, J., & Sprott, D. (2010). Concern with Immediate Consequences Magnifies the Impact of Compulsive Buying Tendencies on College Students’ Credit Card Debt. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44, 155-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01161.x
Joireman, J., Shaffer, M., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion Orientation Explains Why Future Oriented People Exercise and Eat Healthy: Evidence from the Two-Factor Consideration of Future Consequences 14 Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1272-1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212449362
Joireman, J., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars? Those with an Eye toward the Future. Environment & Behavior, 36, 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251476
Khachatryan, H., Joireman, J., & Casavant, K. (2013). Relating Values and Consideration of Future and Immediate Consequences to Consumer Preference for Biofuels: A Three-Dimensional Social Dilemma Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.001
Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V. (2006). Time Perspective and Values: An Exploratory Study of Their Relations to Environmental Attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001
Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. K. C. (2012). Time Perspective and Environmental Engagement: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47, 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of Values, Problem Awareness, and Personal Norm on Willingness to Reduce Personal Car Use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9
Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2013). Overcoming the Distance: Perspective Taking with Future Humans Improves Environmental Engagement. Environment & Behavior, 45, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511417618
Pinheiro, J., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2010). Time Perspective and Sustainable Behavior. In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. García, & M. Frías (Eds.), Psychological Approaches to Sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Rickles, D. A. (2016). Participatory Future of Humanity. In A. Aguirre, B. Foster, & Z. Merali (Eds.), How Should Humanity Steer for the Future (pp. 49-59)? New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20717-9_6
Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The Consideration of Future Consequences: Weighing Immediate and Distant Outcomes of Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
Toepoel, V. (2010). Is Consideration of Future Consequences a Changeable Construct? Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 951-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.029
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public Understanding of Climate Change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66, 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioral Responses to Climate Change; Asymmetry of Intentions and Impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003