This study addressed the system-justifying function of compensatory judgments in person perception. We hypothesized that compensatory judgments of competence and warmth would create an illusion of equality, thereby fulfilling system-justifying motives in the economically unequal society. An experimental vignette study was conducted with 188 Japanese university students. Results indicated that evaluating target persons in a compensatory manner enhanced the perceived legitimacy of the current social system when participants were led to believe that a significant economic gap exists in Japan between the rich and the poor. This suggests that compensatory judgments serve to system justification through restoring the impaired belief in equality. We discussed the implications of our results for system justification theory and the literature on compensation effects in social judgments.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 40, pp. 61-149). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cutright, K. M., Wu, E. C., Banfield, J. C., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2011). When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 62-77. https://doi.org/10.1086/658469
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not All Ideologies Are Created Equal: Epistemic, Existential, and Relational Needs Predict System-Justifying Attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669-688. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.6.669
Ikegami, T. (2006). What Does the Compensatory Judgment in Person Perception Signify? From the System Justification Perspective. [Taijin ninnchi no souhosei ha nani wo imi suruno ka: System justification tono kanren.] The 47th Annual Meeting of Japanese Society of Social Psychology, 78-79. (In Japanese)
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The Role of Stereotyping in System-Justification and the Production of False Consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A Decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
Jost, J. T., Kivetz, Y., Rubini, M., Guermandi, G., & Mosso, C. (2005). System-Justifying Functions of Complementary Regional and Ethnic Stereotypes: Cross-National Evidence. Social Justice Research, 18, 305-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6827-z
Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment: Understanding the Relations between Judgments of Competence and Warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary Justice: Effects of “Poor But Happy” and “Poor But Honest” Stereotype Exemplars on System Justification and Implicit Activation of the Justice Motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
Kay, A. C., Czaplinski, S., & Jost, J. T. (2009). Left-Right Ideological Differences in System Justification following Exposure to Complementary versus Noncomplementary Stereotype Exemplars. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.500
Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Peach, J. M., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M. P., & Spencer, S. J. (2009). Inequality, Discrimination, and the Power of the Status Quo: Direct Evidence for a Motivation to See the Way Things Are as the Way They Should Be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015997
Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., & Young, S. (2005). Victim Derogation and Victim Enhancement as Alternate Routes to System Justification. Psychological Science, 16, 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00810.x
Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian Ideology in the Service of System Justification: How Complementary Stereotypes Help Us to Rationalize Inequality. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 305-358). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Kraus, M. K., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social Class, Sense of Control, and Social Explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992-1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016357
Laurin, K., Shepherd, S., & Kay, A. C. (2010). Restricted Emigration, System Inescapability, and Defense of the Status Quo: System-Justifying Consequences of Restricted Exit Opportunities. Psychological Science, 21, 1075-1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610375448
Mitchell, G., Tetlock, P. E., Mellers, B. A., & Ordonez, L. D. (1993). Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises between Equality and Efficiency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 629-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.629
Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Personality Impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026086
Smith, R. H. (2000). Assimilative and Contrastive Emotional Reactions to upward and downward Social Comparisons. In J. Suls, & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research (pp. 173-200). New York, NY: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_10
Yada, N., & Ikegami, T. (2010). Effects of Priming of Concepts about Relationship on Compensation Effects in Person Perception: Mediating Role of Social Comparison-Based Emotions. [Kankeisei priming ga souhotekininnchi ni oyobosu eikyo: Kanjou no baikaikouka ni tyumoku shite.] In The Proceeding of the 51th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Social Psychology (pp. 418-419). (In Japanese)
Yada, N., & Ikegami, T. (2012). An Investigation on Compensation Effects in Person Perception: Role of Social Comparison-Based Emotions. In Studies in the Humanities (Vol. 63, pp. 9-26). Bulletin of the Graduate School of Literature and Human Sciences, Osaka City University. (In Japanese)
Yada, N., & Ikegami, T. (2014). Compensation versus Halo Effects in Competitive or Cooperative Social Settings: Mediation Effects of Social Comparison-Based Emotions. Urban Scope: E-Journal of the Urban-Culture Research Center, 5, 27-40. http://urbanscope.lit.osaka-cu.ac.jp/journal/vol.005.html
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Kervyn, N., & Judd, C. M. (2008). Compensation versus Halo: The Unique Relations between the Fundamental Dimensions of Social Judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1110-1123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208318602