The aim of this investigation was to explore the merits of the Unified Model of Task-specific Motivation (UMTM). As in this model task-specific components from several partly conflicting theories were integrated, this study constitutes an important contribution to the further development of consensus about motivation theory. Four relatively independent types of valences are the core of the UMTM. Affective and cognitive valences represent feelings while doing an activity and thoughts about the value of its consequences respectively; both types of valences can be positive and negative, hence calling for approach and avoidance motivation respectively. The interaction between these four categories of valences results in a valence expectation, which influences readiness for action. Valences in turn are influenced by four categories of task-specific antecedents, namely appraisals of autonomy, feasibility, and social relatedness, and subjective norm. The global question we tried to answer was to what extent motivational data on specific activities could be modeled in accordance with the UMTM and how different, specific activities affect the influence that the components of the model exert. Structural equation modeling of questionnaire responses of 335 teachers on all components of the model except negative valences with respect to three imaginary types of professional learning activities (formal training, personal study, and reflection on practice) revealed that characteristics of the task determine to what extent components of the model come into play. It is concluded that the model represents a first promising step towards reuniting conflicting theories of motivation.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2008). Scaling and Testing Multiplicative Combinations in the Expectancy-Value Model of Attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2222-2247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00389.x
Bakkenes, I. (1996). Professional Isolation of Primary School Teachers: A Task-Specific Approach (Leiden). Doctoral Dissertation, Leiden: DSWO Press.
Bakkenes, I., de Brabander, C. J., & Imants, J. G. M. (1999). Teacher Isolation and Communication Network Analysis in Primary Schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 166-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968518
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1992). On Rectifying the Comparative Anatomy of Perceived Control: Comments on “Cognates of Personal Control”. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80153-2
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman & Co.
Bentler, P. M. (2008). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
Boekaerts, M., Van Nuland, H. J. C., & Martens, R. L. (2010). Perspectives on Motivation: What Mechanism Energise Students’ Behaviour in the Classroom. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International Handbook of Psychology in Education (pp. 535-568). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Carver, C. S. (2006). Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7
Clark, R., Livingstone, D. W., & Smaller, H. (2012). Teacher Learning and Power in the Knowledge Society. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-973-2
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
De Brabander, C. J., & Martens, R. L. (2014). Towards a Unified Theory of Task-Specific Motivation. Educational Research Review, 11, 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.11.001
De Brabander, C. J., Rozendaal, J. S., & Martens, R. L. (2009). Investigating Efficacy Expectancy as Criterion for Comparison of Teacher-versus Student-Regulated Learning in Higher Education. Learning Environments Research, 12, 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-009-9062-y
de Brabander, K., Vinken, H., & van Wolput, B. (2011). Competencies, Professional Development, School Climate, and Leraar24: A Panel Survey among Teachers 2010. Leraaar24 rapportenreeks, nummer 13, Heerlen: Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Elliot, A. J. (2006). The Hierarchical Model of Approach-Avoidance Motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and Avoidance Motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 73-92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009009018235
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
Eren, A. (2009). Exploring the Relationships among Mirror Neurons, Theory of Mind, and Achievement Goals: Towards a Model of Achievement Goal Contagion in Educational Settings. Educational Research Review, 4, 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.03.002
Imants, J. G. M., & de Brabander, C. J. (1996). Sense of Efficacy of Teachers and Principals for Learner and School Oriented Tasks in Primary Schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(95)00053-M
Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and Dynamic Aspects of Interest Development: Theoretical Considerations from an Ontogenetic Perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
Krapp, A. (2005). Basic Needs and the Development of Interest and Intrinsic Motivational Orientations. Learning and Instruction, 15, 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors Affecting Teachers’ Participation in Professional Learning Activities. Teacher and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, Motivation, and Anxiety: Brain Mechanisms and Psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1248-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00275-3
Little, J. (1990). The Persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers’ Professional Relations. Teachers College Record, 91, 509-536.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reeve, J., Nix, G., & Hamm, D. (2003). Testing Models of the Experience of Self-Determination in Intrinsic Motivation and the Conundrum of Choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 375-292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well Being. The American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in Education. Theory, Research, and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Smit, K., de Brabander, C. J., & Martens, R. L. (2014). Student-Centred and Teacher-Centred Learning Environment in Pre-Vocational Secondary Education: Psychological Needs, and Motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58, 695-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.821090
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015