Detecting Target Identity—Location/Response Binding in Visuo-spatial Tasks Using a Cueing Procedure: An Exploratory Study
- 1 The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
- 2 The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Abstract
We aimed to determine the suitability of a “new” procedure for detecting the existence of binding between a target’s identity and its location/response during its processing on a prime trial in a visuo-spatial task. Importantly, the method involved cueing the impending likelihood of a binding violation on a subsequent probe trial. If the latency increasing impact of a binding violation can be reduced or removed when the cue proved to be valid, RT reductions for Conditions that involved a binding violation would show a larger latency decrease than those which did not (relative to uninformative cue trials). This result pattern did not occur, even though data showed that the cue information was used for preparation (RT [valid cue] < RT [uninformative cue] > RT [invalid cue]). Either a target identity—location/response binding does not occur, or advance knowledge of its impending violation does not modulate the violation’s latency increase impact. In any event, the use of the cue procedure employed here to detect binding is not a viable one.
- Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., & Khan, M. (2002). Influence of Probe-Trial Selection on the Location Negative Priming Effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revuecanadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 56, 273. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087403
- Buckolz, E., Edgar, C., Kajaste, B., Lok, M., & Khan, M. (2012). Inhibited Prime-Trial Distractor Responses Solely Produce the Visual Spatial Negative Priming Effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1632-1643. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0366-0
- D’Angelo, M. C., Thomson, D. R., Tipper, S. P., & Milliken, B. (2016). Negative Priming 1985to 2015: A Measure of Inhibition, the Emergence of Alternative Accounts, and the Multipleprocess Challenge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1890-1909. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1173077
- Fitzgeorge, L., & Buckolz, E. (2008). Spatial Negative Priming Modulation: The Influence of Probe-Trial Target Cueing, Distractor Presence, and an Intervening Response. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 994-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701686250
- Fitzgeorge, L., Buckolz, E., & Khan, M. (2011). Recently Inhibited Responses Are Avoided for both Masked and Nonmasked Primes in a Spatial Negative Priming Task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1435. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0125-7
- Frings, C., Schneider, K. K., & Fox, E. (2015). The Negative Priming Paradigm: An Update and Implications for Selective Attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1577-1597. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0841-4
- Geller, E. S. (1974). Preceding Prediction Outcome and Prediction Outcome Probability: Interacting Determinants of Choice Reaction Time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 426. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037154
- Geller, E. S. (1975). Prediction Outcome and Choice Reaction Time: Inhibition versus Facilitation Effects. Acta Psychologica, 39, 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(75)90022-0
- Hommel, B. (2004). Event Files: Feature Binding in and across Perception and Action. Trends Incognitive Sciences, 8, 494-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
- Hommel, B. (2007). Feature Integration across Perception and Action: Event Files Affect Response Choice. Psychological Research, 71, 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0035-1
- Hommel, B., Memelink, J., Zmigrod, S., & Colzato, L. S. (2014). Attentional Control of the Creation and Retrieval of Stimulus-Response Bindings. Psychological Research, 78, 520-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0503-y