In the literature, the tendency to attribute hostile intent is called “hostile attribution bias”. After ambiguous provocation, aggressive children are more likely than nonaggressive children to attribute a hostile intent to the peer. Children who make hostile attribution bias are generally more rejected by peers. However, it seems that nonaggressive children may also attribute hostile intentions to peers. The goals of these studies are 1) to detect the profile of young children who attribute hostile intentions and 2) to identify if there is difference between children who showed hostile attribution bias and those who did not. In the first study, 176 preschoolers were tested with the Unfair Card Game, that is a virtual game inducing frustration/provocation and including a high level of personal involvement. In the second study, 102 children were also tested with the Unfair Card Game, but also with some measures of social cognition. In both studies, parents and teachers completed some questionnaires. Results showed notably that children who displayed HAB manifested less positive affects and more negative affects during the frustration task. Compared with children who displayed no hostile attribution bias, children who did do so were perceived by teachers as more extraverted and by parents as having a higher level of externalizing behavior. It seems possible to identify children who made hostile attribution bias. Results are discussed in relation to the literature on the hostile attribution bias.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
Astington, J. W., & Baird, J. A. (2005). Why Language Matters for Theory of Mind. New-York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.001.0001
Barisnikov, K., Van der Linden, M., & Hippolyte, L. (2004). Tache de résolution sociale. Manuel inédit. Genève.
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001). Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children’s Theory of Mind. Child Development, 74, 1032-1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00333
Choe, D. E., Lane, J. D., Grabell, A. S., & Olson, S. L. (2013). Developmental Precursors of Young School-Age Children’s Hostile Attribution Bias. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2245-2256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032293
Comte-Gervais, I., Giron, A., Soares-Boucaud, I., & Poussin, G. (2008). Evaluation de l’intelligence sociale chez l’enfant. L’information Psychiatrique, 84, 667-673. https://doi.org/10.3917/inpsy.8407.0667
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A Review and Reformulation of Social Information-Processing Mechanisms in Children’s Social Adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
Dodge, K. A. (2006). Translational Science in Action: Hostile Attributional Style and the Development of Aggressive Behavior Problems. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 791-814. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060391
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social Information Processing Factors in Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Children’s Peer Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146-1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146
Dodge, K. A., & Frame, C. L. (1982). Social Cognitive Biases and Deficits in Aggressive Boys. Child Development, 53, 620-635. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129373
Hippolyte, L., Iglesias, K., Van der Linden, M., & Barisnikov, K. (2010). Social Reasoning Skills in Adults with Down Syndrome: The Role of Language, Executive Functions and Socio-Emotional Behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54, 714-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01299.x
Houssa, M., Mazzone, S., & Nader-Grosbois, N. (2014). Validation d’une version francophone de l’Inventaire de la Théorie de l’Esprit. Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée, 64, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.02.002
Hughes, C., Oksanen, H., Taylor, A., Jackson, J., Murray, L., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2002). “I’m Gonna Beat You!” SNAP!: An Observational Paradigm for Assessing Young Children’s Disruptive Behaviour in Competitive Play. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43, 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00041
Hughes C., Soares-Boucaud I., Hochman J., & Frith U. ,et al. (1998). Comportement Social chez les enfants porteurs de troubles envahissants du développement: Effets du groupe, de l’informateur et de la “Théorie de l’esprit” Approche Neuropsychologique de l’Apprentissage de l’Enfant 48, 78-85.
Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., & Bonazinga, L. A. (2012). Psychometric Evaluation of the Theory of Mind Inventory (ToMI): A Study of Typically Developing Children and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1244-7
Hutchins, T. L., Prelock, P. A., & Chace, W. (2008). Test-Retest Reliability of a Theory of Mind Task Battery for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 23, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357608322998
Nader-Grosbois, N., & Houssa, M. (2016). Validation de la version francophone de la Batterie de taches de la Théorie de l’esprit. Enfance, 2.
Orobio de Castro, B., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile Attribution of Intent and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analysis. Child Development, 73, 916-934. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00447
Perron-Borelli, M. (1996). Echelles Différentielles d’Efficiences Intellectuelles. Forme révisée (EDEI-R). Paris: Editions et Applications Psychologiques.
Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Brown, M. M. (1988). Early Family Experience, Social Problem Solving Patterns, and Children’s Social Competence. Child Development, 59, 107-120. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130393
Roskam I., De Maere-Gaudissart A., & Vandenplas-Holper C. ,et al. (2000). Mise au point d’un instrument d’évaluation de la personnalité des enfants à partir du Modèle à Cinq Facteurs L’orientation scolaire et professionnelle 29, 661-672.
Roskam, I., Meunier, J. C., Stievenart, M., & Van de Moortele, G. (2009). Troubles externalisés du comportement et facteurs de résilience chez l’enfant. Resilience, Regulation and Quality of Life: Concepts, Assessment and Intervention, 45.
Roskam, I., Stievenart, M., Brassart, E., Houssa, M., Loop, L., Mouton, B., Schelstraete, M.-A. et al. (2016). The Unfair Card Game: A Promising Tool to Assess Externalizing Behavior in Preschoolers. Pratiques Psychologiques, 22, 61-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2015.09.004
Runions, K. C., & Keating, D. P. (2007). Young Children’s Social Information Processing: Family Antecedents and Behavioral Correlates. Developmental Psychology, 43, 838-849. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.838
Schultz, D., Ambike, A., Logie, S. K., Bohner, K. E., Stapleton, L. M., VanderWalde, H., Betkowski, J. A. et al. (2010). Assessment of Social Information Processing in Early Childhood: Development and Initial Validation of the Schultz Test of Emotion Processing-Preliminary Version. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 601-613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9390-5
Van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., Vriens, A., Scheepmaker, M., Smit, M., & Porton, E. (2011). The Development of a Diagnostic Instrument to Measure Social Information Processing in Children with Mild to Borderline Intellectual Disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.10.012
Weschler, D. (2004). WPPSI-III: Manuel d’interprétation. Paris: Les Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Ziv, Y., & Sorongon, A. (2011). Social Information Processing in Preschool Children: Relations to Sociodemographic Risk and Problem Behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.009