Forgiving Significant Interpersonal Offenses: The Role of Victim/Offender Racial Similarity
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Abstract
The influence of victim/offender racial similarity on victim forgiveness was investigated in a study of interpersonal transgressions. It was hypothesized that racial similarity between victim and offender would influence forgiveness only for transgressions that were less distressing for the victim. Participants were 104 adults (45 Black and 59 White) who provided a narrative description of a significant interpersonal transgression they had experienced and completed measures of transgression-related distress and forgiveness. Forgiveness was measured as positive (benevolence) and negative (revenge, avoidance) motivations toward the offender. For negative motive- tions, revenge and avoidance, there was no effect of racial similarity: more severe distress was associated with less forgiveness for all victim/offender pairings. However, the results revealed a significant interaction of victim/offender racial similarity and distress for positive motivations: Black victims reported increased benevolence towards Black offenders after more distressing transgressions. Victims in other racial combinations reported reduced benevolence for more distressing transgressions. In group favoring of Black offenders by Black victims may be an unexplored aspect of forgiveness. Little research has addressed the potential influence of context on interpersonal forgiveness, and this study suggests that these influences may play an important role.
- Bauer, D., J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interaction in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5
- Digeser, P. (2001). Political forgiveness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Erguner-Tekinalp, B. (2007). Forgiveness of historical and current racial transgressions: A study of intergroup forgiveness among Blacks. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 68.
- Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2000). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10381-000
- Girard, M., Mullet, E., & Calahan, S. (2002). Mathematics of forgiveness. American Journal of Psychology, 115, 351-375. doi:10.2307/1423422
- Harris, A. H. S., & Thoresen, C. E. (2005). Forgiveness, unforgiveness, health, and disease. In E. L. Worthington (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 321-334). New York: Routledge.
- Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for interaction in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924-936. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
- Johnson, D. (2006). Crime salience, perceived racial bias, and Blacks’ punitive attitudes. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4, 1-18. doi:10.1300/J222v04n04_01
- Johnson, D. (2008). Racial prejudice, perceived injustice, and the Black-White gap in punitive attitudes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 198-206. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.02.009
- Johnson, P. O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 115-134.
- Kaminer, D., Stein, D. J., Mbanga, I., & Zungu-Dirwayi, N. (2001). The Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa: Relation to psychiatric status and forgiveness among survivors of human rights abuses. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 373-377. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.4.373
- Mania, E. W. (2009). The intergroup dynamics of responding to transgression: An examination of racial biases and disparities in responding to wrongdoers. Doctoral Thesis, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database, UMI No. 3373307.
- McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586