Family Background and Environment, Psychological Distress, and Juvenile Delinquency
- 1
Abstract
The relationship between youth offending and family background is still unclear in the literature. This study explored the role of family factors and psychological distress in relation to delinquency and youth offending to try and explicate the relative importance of family structure, family relations, and psychological distress. The study used the Brief Symptom Inventory, the Family Environment Scale, and the Delinquency Scale in a structured interview format to measure psychological distress, family structure and relations, and levels of youth offending, in 219 older children and adolescents aged between 12-17 years living in areas associated with high levels of youth offending in the UK. Analysis involved correlations, hierarchical multiple regression and analysis of variance. Family relations were the best predictors of delinquency and were also correlated with psychological distress. The relationship between delinquency and psychological distress indicated that participants with more psychological distress were less likely to be involved in criminal behaviour. The study supports the conclusion that youth offending and psychological distress are both influenced by a range of factors in the family, but may be unrelated to each other.
- Blackburn, R. (1993). The psychology of criminal conduct: Theory, research, and practice. Chichester: Wiley.
- Carey, G. (1992). Twin imitation for antisocial behaviour: Implications for genetic and family environment research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 18-25. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.101.1.18
- Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research
- Derogatis, L. R (1993). Brief symptom inventory: Administration, scoring and procedures manual. New York: National Computer Systems.
- Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Lynkskey, M. T. (1994). Parental separation, adolescent psychopathology, and problem behaviours. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 33, 1122-1131. doi:10.1097/00004583-199410000-00008
- Fitzgerald, R. (2003). An examination of sex differences in delinquency. Statistics Canada Catalogue Number 85-561-MIE—001. Ottawa.
- Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1950). Unravelling Juvenile delinquency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Haapasalo, J., & Tremblay, R. E. (1994). Physically aggressive boys from ages 6 to 12: Family background, parenting behaviour, and prediction of delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 1044-1052. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.1044
- Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., & Cox, R. (1985). Long-term effects of divorce and remarriage on the adjustment of children. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry, 24, 518-830. doi:10.1016/S0002-7138(09)60052-2
- Hirsch, N. D. M. (1937). Dynamic causes of juvenile crime. Cambridge, MA: Sci-Art Publishers.
- Kakar, S. (2005). Gang membership, delinquent friends and criminal family memebers: Determining the connections. Journal of Gang Research, 13, 41-52.
- LeBlanc, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (1988). A study of factors associated with the stability of hidden delinquency. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 1, 269-291.
- Lindner, M. S., Stanley-Hagen, M., & Cavanaugh B. J. (1992). The adjustment of children in non-divorced, divorced, single-mother, and remarried families. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 35-72. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.1992.tb00302.x
- Mack, K. Y., Leiber, M. J., Featherstone, R. A., & Monserud, M. A. (2007). Reassessing the family-delinquency association: Do family type, family processes, and economic factors make a difference? Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 51-67. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.11.015