L2/Ln Sign Language Tests and Assessment Procedures and Evaluation
- 1 University of Texas at Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA
- 2 Department of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Lamar University, Beaumont, USA
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to investigate sign language assessments in use as a tool for evaluating the linguistic abilities for job related requirements for bilingual professionals. Each corresponding sign language assessment will be discussed in terms of its original purpose, content, how it is used today, followed by a discussion of its psychometric properties via strengths and weaknesses. In some cases, when available, a discussion of the background in regards to test development will be given. Psychometrically sound assessments will allow a more consistent evaluation of the professionals who support the Deaf community. In terms of research, having normed measures will lead to an increase in research to improve pedagogical practices and the delivery of educational services.
- Association of Visual Language Interpreters of Canada (AVLIC). (n.d.). Canadian Evaluation System. http://www.avlic.ca/ces
- Bochner, J. H., Samar, V. J., Hauser, P. C., Garrison, W. M., Searls, J. M., & Sanders, C. A. (2016). Validity of the American Sign Language Discrimination Test. Language Testing, 33, 473-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215590849
- Boers-Visker, E., van den Broek-Laven, A., & van den Bogaerde, B. (2014). Determining Aspects of Text Difficulty for the Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT) Functional Assessment Instrument. Language Testing and Assessment, 3, 53-75.
- Bontempo, K., & Levitzke-Gray, P. (2009). Interpreting Down under: Sign Language Interpreter Education and Training in Australia. International Perspectives on Sign Language Interpreter Education, 149-170.
- Caccamise, F. (2008). SLPI Paper #9: Scoring the Consistency of Your SLPI Team Members’ Rating. https://www.rit.edu/ntid/slpi/sites/rit.edu.ntid.slpi/files/page_file_ attachments/SLPIUseReliability.pdf
- Caccamise, F., & Newell, W. (2010). Sign Language Proficiency Interview (SLPI): American Sign Language (SLPI: ASL). Scheduling and Interview Procedures. http://www.ntid.rit.edu/slpi
- Caccamise, F., & Newell, W. (2015a). Paper 2: What Is the SLPI Rating Scale? https://www.rit.edu/slpi/faq
- Caccamise, F., & Newell, W. (2015b). SLPI Paper 5: SLPI Training Workshop (WS) & Follow up Services. http://www.rit.edu/ntid/slpi
- Caccamise, F., Newell, W., & Mitchell-Caccamise, M. (1983). Use of the Sign Language Proficiency Interview for Assessing the Sign Communicative Competence of Louisiana School for the Deaf Dormitory Counselor Applicants. Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology, 16, 283-304.
- Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
- European Centre for Modern Languages of the Council of Europe. (n.d.) Sign Languages and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. http://www.ecml.at/ECML-Programme/Programme2012-2015/ProSign/Assessment/tabid/1766/Default.aspx
- Gallaudet University ASL Diagnostic and Evaluation Services. (n.d.) ASLPI American Sign Language Proficiency Interview. http://www.gallaudet.edu/asl-diagnostic-and-evaluation-services/aslpi
- Haug, T. (2005). Review of Sign Language Assessment Instruments. Sign Language & Linguistics, 8, 61-98. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.14.04hau