The Communicative Effects of a Cup of Coffee on Dyadic Conversation
- 1 College of Comprehensive Psychology, Ritsumeikan University, Ibaraki, Japan
- 2 Faculty of Human Sciences, Osaka University of Economics, Osaka, Japan
Abstract
Findings from previous studies have suggested that environmental factors affect the quality of communication. Although the impact of several environmental factors such as fixed- and semifixed-feature elements has been investigated, the present pre-registered study focuses on a more casual environmental factor: the presence of a cup of coffee. In the present study, 118 non-student participants engaged in a dyadic, face-to-face, unstructured conversation with a stranger of the same gender. Participants with a cup of coffee reported an identical level of rapport (a type of close and positive communication), friendliness, vigor-activity, and tension-anxiety as participants with a cup of water (control group 1). They also reported higher rapport friendliness and vigor-activity than participants in the no drink condition (control group 2), though the difference in rapport did not reach the level of significance. However, for rapport, the positive impact of coffee was salient in individuals who held a strong belief in the communicative effect of coffee. The findings indicate that a cup of coffee can be an environmental factor that potentially enhances the quality of communication.
- Bastia, E., & Schwarzschild, M. A. (2003). DARPP Chocolate: A Caffeinated Morsel of Striatal Signaling. Science Signaling, 2003, PE2.
- Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S., Davis, J. M., & Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad Rapport and the Accuracy of Its Judgment across Situations: A Lens Model Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.110
- Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Floyd, K. (2010). Nonverbal Communication. Boston, MA: Ally & Bacon.
- Dwyer, R. J., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. W. (2018). Smartphone Use Undermines Enjoyment of Face-to-Face Social Interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007
- Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
- Huntley, E. D., & Juliano, L. M. (2012). The Caffeine Expectancy Questionnaire (CaffEQ): Construction, Psychometric Properties, and Associations with Caffeine Use, Caffeine Dependence, and Other Related Variables. Psychological Assessment, 24, 592-607. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026417
- International Coffee Organization (2018). The Current State of the Global Coffee Trade. http://www.ico.org/monthly_coffee_trade_stats.asp
- James, J. E. (1997). Understanding Caffeine: A Biobehavioral Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Knapp, M. L., Hall, J. A., & Horgan, T. G. (2013). Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
- Lin, S., Hsiao, Y.-Y., & Wang, M. (2014). Review of the Profile of Mood States 2nd Edition (POMS 2). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32, 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913505995
- Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2014). The iPhone Effect: The Quality of In-Person Social Interactions in the Presence of Mobile Devices. Environment and Behavior, 48, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
- Rapoport, A. (1990). The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach (2nd ed.). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
- Ruxton, S. H. C. (2008). The Impact of Caffeine on Mood, Cognitive Function, Performance and Hydration: A Review of Benefits and Risks. Nutrition Bulletin, 33, 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-3010.2007.00665.x
- Tickle-Degnen, L. (2006). Nonverbal Behavior and Its Functions in the Ecosystem of Rapport. In V. Manusov, & M. Patterson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Nonverbal Communication (pp. 381-399). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152.n20