The “Taylorian” management thinking of the outside control in the past has been unable to adapt to the current Internet era. The external control has changed to the flexible management of self-control, and the increase of job autonomy has become a trend. Job autonomy refers to the discretion of an organization to allow employees to complete tasks when, where, in what order and in what manner. In the past, the mainstream theoretical models and empirical studies have found that the job autonomy has a positive impact on employees. But currently the new research has found that the excessive job autonomy can have a negative impact on employees, and there is a “too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect. This article mainly expounds the “too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect of the job autonomy, and then, explains the effect by the two types mechanisms, “additive benefit and cost” and “interactive motivation and opportunity”. Finally, this article puts forward some issues that should be paid attention to future researches.
KeywordsJob AutonomyToo-Much-of-a-Good-ThingInteractive Motivation and OpportunityAdditive Benefit and Cost
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources Model: State of the Art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Baltes, B. B., Bauer, C. C., Bajdo, L. M., & Parker, C. P. (2002). The Use of Multitrait-Multimethod Data for Detecting Nonlinear Relationships: The Case of Psychological Climate and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Business & Psychology, 17, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016231816394
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999). Flexible and Compressed Workweek Schedules: A Meta-Analysis of Their Effects on Work-Related Criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 496-513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252-1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research: Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. Academy of Management Review, 7, 560-569. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285240
Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The Measurement of Job Autonomy. Human Relations, 38, 551-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604
Brink, A. G., Emerson, D. J., & Yang, L. (2016). Job Autonomy and Counterproductive Behaviors in Chinese Accountants: The Role of Job-Related Attitudes. Journal of International Accounting Research, 15, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51194
Crawford, E. R., & Lepine, J. A. (2013). A Configural Theory of Team Processes: Accounting for the Structure of Taskwork and Teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 38, 32-48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0206
Gino, F., & Wiltermuth, S. S. (2014). Evil Genius? How Dishonesty Can Lead to Greater Creativity. Psychological Science, 25, 973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614520714
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 16, 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
Lu, J. G., Brockner, J., Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2017). A Dark Side of Experiencing Job Autonomy: Unethical Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 222-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.05.007
Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing More with Less? Flexible Working Practices and the Intensification of Work. Human Relations, 63, 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
Kimmsw, H., & Stoner, M. (2008). Burnout and Turnover Intention among Social Workers: Effects of Role Stress, Job Autonomy and Social Support. Administration in Social Work, 32, 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643100801922357
Kubicek, B., Paskvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The Bright and Dark Sides of Job Autonomy. In Job Demands in a Changing World of Work: Impact on Workers’ Health and Performance and Implications for Research and Practice (pp. 45-63). Berlin: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54678-0_4
Malinowska, D., Tokarz, A., & Wardzichowska, A. (2018). Job Autonomy in Relation to Work Engagement and Workaholism: Mediation of Autonomous and Controlled Work Motivation. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 31, 445-458. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01197
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. A. (2013). The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337-1357. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and Validating a Comprehensive Measure for Assessing Job Design and the Nature of Work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1321-1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
Park, R., & Jang, S. J. (2015). Mediating Role of Perceived Supervisor Support in the Relationship between Job Autonomy and Mental Health: Moderating Role of Value-Means Fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 703-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1109536
Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693
Searcy, P. D. (2012). Job Autonomy as a Predictor of Mental Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Quality-Competitive Environment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9244-3
Sia, S. K., & Appu, A. V. (2015). Job Autonomy and Workplace Creativity: Moderating Role of Task Complexity. Global Business Review, 16, 772-784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915591435
Taris, T. W. (2006). Bricks without Clay: On Urban Myths in Occupational Health Psychology. Work & Stress, 20, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370600893410
Vardi, Y., & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehavior in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Management. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609052
Vergauwe, J., Wille, B., Hofmans, J., Kaiser, R. B., & Fruyt, F. D. (2017). The Too Little/Too Much Scale: A New Rating Format for Detecting Curvilinear Effects. Organizational Research Methods, 20, 518-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117706534
Warr, P. B. (1994). A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Work and Mental Health. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 8, 84-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379408259982
Xing, L., Sun, J. M., Yin, K., & Wang, Z. (2018). The Too-Much-of-a-Good-Thing Effect and Its Mechanisms. Advances in Psychological Science, 26, 719-730. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00719
Yang, T. S., Pandey, A., & Liao, Y. (2017). A Path from Job Autonomy to Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Perceived Organizational Politics as Mediator. Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 44-56.