Application of Life-Cycle Assessment for the Study of Carbon and Water Footprints of the 16.5 MWe Wind Farm in Villonaco, Loja, Ecuador
- 1 UNIBA, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract
Wind technology is considered to be among the most promising types of renewable energy sources, and due to high oil prices and growing concerns about climate change and energy security, it has been the subject of extensive considerations in recent years, including questions related to the relative sus tainability of electricity production when the manufacturing, assembly, transportation and dismantling processes of these facilities are taken into account. The present article evaluates the environmental impacts, carbon emissions and water consumption, derived from the production of electric energy of the Villonaco wind farm, located in Loja , Ecuador, during its entire life cycle, using the Life Cycle Analysis for this purpose. Finally, it is concluded that wind energy has greater environmental advantages since it has lower values of carbon and water footprints than other energy sources. Additionally, with the techniques Cumulative Energy Demand and Energy Return on Investment, sustainability in the production of electricity from wind power in Ecuador is demonstrated; and, that due to issues of vulnerability to climate change, the diversification of its energy mix is essential considering the inclusion of non-conventional renewable sources such as solar or wind, this being the only way to reduce both the carbon footprint and the water from the energy supply.
- Ghenai, C. (2012) Life Cycle Analysis of Wind Turbine, Sustainable Development—Energy, Engineering and Technologies—Manufacturing and Environment. Ghenai, P.C., Ed., IntechOpen, London, 19-32.
- GWEC (Global Wind Energy Council) (2021) Global Wind Report 2021. Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels.
- Martínez, E., Sanz, F., Pellegrini, S., Jiménez, E. and Blanco, J. (2009) Life-Cycle Assessment of a 2-MW Rated Power Wind Turbine: CML Method. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, Article No, 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0033-9
- Guezuraga, B., Zauner, R. and Polz, W. (2012) Life Cycle Assessment of Two Different 2 MW Class Wind Turbines. Renewable Energy, 37, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.008
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (n.d.) Sustainable Development. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd/sd
- Tremeac, B. and Meunier, F. (2009) Life Cycle Analysis of 4.5 MW and 250 W Wind Turbines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 2104-2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.01.001
- Razdan, P. and Garrett, P. (2017) Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an onshore V100-2.0 MW Wind Plant. Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Aarhus.
- álvarez Gallego, S. (2017) La huella de carbono y el análisis de ciclo de vida. Primera Ed., Aenor Internacional, S.A.U, Madrid, 111.
- International Electrotechnical Commission (2005) IEC 61400-1: 2005. Wind Turbines—Part 1: Design Requirements. IEC Central Office, Geneva.
- Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources (2019) National Energy Balance. Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources, Quito.
- Agency for the Regulation and Control of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources (2019) Annual and Multiannual Statistics of the Ecuadorian Electricity Sector. Agency for Regulation and Control of Electricity, Quito.
- Dongfang Electric Corporation (2020) Descripción General Tecnológica para Aerogenerador de Accionamiento Directo D3200-155. Dongfang Electric International Corporation, Chengdu.
- Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy (2014) Wind Atlas of Ecuador. Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy, Quito.
- Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources (2020) Villonaco 2&3 Wind Farm Project. Ministry of Energy and Non-Renewable Natural Resources, Quito.