A More Renewable-Friendly Electrical Grid: Thermal Storage Refrigeration for Demand Response in California and Denmark
- 1 Program for International Energy Technologies, University of California, Davis, USA
- 2 Agriculture and Resource Economics, University of California, Davis, USA
- 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Davis, USA
Abstract
Energy storage technologies, which enable demand response, are being explored throughout the world as a component of strategies for switching to renewable intermittent energy sources and reducing peak loads. This study examines thermal storage refrigeration (TSR) technology as a case study for the potential value of demand response in California and Denmark. Using technical specifications from a TSR prototype developed at UC Davis and market data from California and Denmark, the analysis examines possible business models for the TSR refrigerators and highlights market characteristics that are important to its adoption. Results suggest that the TSR technology is not a viable option in the current market environment in Denmark, but could payback in less than 6 years in California if a part of a demand response based virtual power plant. In a hypothetical future scenario involving real-time pricing in the retail market, a high degree of price volatility would be needed to make TSR technology appealing to residential consumers. Based on this analysis, an interesting area of future work would focus on the market potential of TSR technology for commercial and industrial applications.
- IDA, “The IDA Climate Plan 2050,” The Danish Society of Engineers, Copenhagen, 2009.
- A. Schwarzenegger, “Executive Order S-14-08,” California, 2008.
- California, “Assembly Bill No. 32,” CARB, 2006.
- EnerNOC, E”nerNOC Provides Key Demand Response Resources to Southern California Edison,” EnerNOC, Inc., 2009.
- J. Garthwaite, “Obama Signs the Stimulus: What’s in Store for Clean Energy,” Gigaom, 2009.
- D. Wight, “Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering,” Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 2010.
- D. J. Hammerstrom, “Pacific Northwest GridWise Testbed Demonstration Projects: Part I. Olympic Peninsula Project,” Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Redmond, 2007.
- P. Fox-Penner, “Smart Power: Climate Change, the Smart Grid, and the Future of Electric Utilities,” Island Press, Washington DC, 2010.
- Ecogrid, “Ecogrid EU: A Prototype for European Smart Grids in Brief,” 2011.
- Danskenergi and Energinet.dk, “Smart Grid in Denmark,” 2010.
- W. M. Warwick, “A Primer on Electric Utilities, Deregulation, and Restructuring of US Electricity Markets,” US Department of Energy, Washington DC, 2002. doi:10.2172/15001013
- Energinet.dk, “Electricity,” 2011 http://www.energinet.dk/EN/EL/Sider/default.aspx
- NordPool, “Elspot Prices,” 2011 http://www.nordpoolspot.com/Market-data1/Elspot/Area-Prices/ALL1/
- Energinet.dk, “Regulation C2: The Balancing Market and Balance Settlement,” 2008.
- Eurostat, “Electricity Prices for Household Customers,” 2011. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=ten00115&plugin=1
- CAISO, “Market and Operations,” 2011. http://www.caiso.com/market/Pages/MarketProcesses.aspx
- CPUC, “Electricity and Natural Gas Regulation in California,” 2011.http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/
- ETCC, “Emerging Technologies Coordinating Council,” 2011. http://www.etcc-ca.com/
- CPUC, “California’s Decoupling Policy,” CPU Commission, Sacramento, 2007.
- FEHA, “Market Data,” 2011. http://www.feha.dk/default.asp?mainmenu=3