Modeling the Prospects of Plug-In Electric Buses to Reduce GHG Emissions and Cost While Meeting Route Demands: A Case Study of the “Unitrans” Bus Fleet Serving the Davis, California Urbanized Area
- 1 University of California Davis, Davis, USA
- 2 University of California Davis, Davis, USA
- 3 University of California Davis, Davis, USA
Abstract
As university campuses look to decrease their greenhouse gas emissions, plug-in electric buses may provide a low carbon alternative to conventionally fossil-powered buses. This study investigates the viability for Unitrans, the bus service for the greater Davis area and the university campus, to replace current compressed natural gas buses with plug-in electric versions. This study presents an inventory of market available electric buses, their associated costs, incentives, and infrastructure concerns, and compares projected energy use, net present cost, and greenhouse gas emissions with their CNG counterparts. ADVISOR vehicle simulation software is used to estimate the energy use of a typical electric bus (New Flyer Xcelsior XE40 300 kW) and compare to the current CNG model (Orion V) along an actual Unitrans route. The model estimates that the selected bus can travel 146 miles on a single charge, with a fuel economy of 1.75 kWh per mile, which meets the service requirements. Results for bus replacement schedules between 5 and 49 in the 12-year analysis period indicate that between 1600 and 22,000 MT of carbon can be avoided. The net present cost analysis indicates that the potential savings from the replacement of a single CNG bus with an electric bus (with available incentives) ranges from $146,000 - $211,000 per bus over its lifetime, depending on infrastructure costs.
- USEPA (2015) Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/sources/transportation.html
- Noel, L. (2014) A Cost Benefit Analysis of a V2G-Capable Electric School Bus Compared to a Traditional Diesel School Bus. Applied Energy, 126, 246-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.009
- Miles, J. (2014) Developing a Viable Electric Bus Service: The Milton Keynes Demonstration Project. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 357-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.063
- Abbasi, T. (2011) “Renewable” Hydrogen: Prospects and Challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 3034-3040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.026
- Ruth, M. (2009) Hydrogen Pathways: Cost, Well-to-Wheels Energy Use, and Emissions for the Current Technology Status of Seven Hydrogen Production, Delivery, and Distribution Scenarios. NREL Technical Report, NREL.
- Sinha, P., et al. (2010) Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Institutions of Higher Education. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 60, 568-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.60.5.568
- Palmere, A. (2015) Interview with Anthony Palmere. In: Mickle, C., Ed.
- Kirk, C. (2015) Details of UC Davis Emissions. In: Mickle, C., Ed.
- Thomas, W. (2015) Discussion Regarding Electric Buses at Standford University. In: Mickle, C., Ed.
- Kahn, Z. (2015) UC Davis: Bus Charging and Specifications. In: Mickle, C., Ed.
- Gao, W.Z. (2007) Modeling and Simulation of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles. IEEE.
- Altoona (2015) Federal Transit Bus Test—New Flyer XE40. US DOT, 1-128.
- ACT (2015) Advanced Clean Transit. In: Board, A.R., Ed.
- Wyley, A. (2015) Correspondence with Andrew Wyley, Unitrans Maintenance Manager. In: Mickle, C., Ed.
- Cook, J. (2014) The Future of Electricity Prices in California: Understanding Market Drivers and Forecasting Prices to 2040. UC Davis Energy Efficiency Center, 1-37.
- Williams, D. (2015) Email Correspondence between Damon Williams and Colin Mickle Regarding Electric Bus Charging Cost. In: Mickle, C., Ed.
- Thomas, W. (2015) Electric Buses at Standford. California Higher Education Sustainability Conference.