Economic Analysis and Environmental Impacts of a Hybrid PV System in Arid Climate Considering Different Types of Solar Trackers
- 1 Department of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA
- 2 Department of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA
- 3 Department of Computer Science & Electrical Engineering, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, USA
Abstract
This paper presents a study aimed at evaluating and comparing the performance of six different tracking systems for photovoltaic (PV) with diesel-battery hybrid system in arid climate of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). The study considered various technical and economic factors including system net present cost (NPC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), and PV power generation using energy analysis and microgrid design software “HOMER”. It also presents an overview of the current electricity production and demand in the Kingdom. The weather data used in this study have been collected from the new solar atlas launched by King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy (KACARE). The selected solar resource monitoring station for this study is located near to Riyadh city and has an annual average daily total irradiation of 6300 W/m 2 /day. The study shows that, for stand-alone PV system in the vicinity of Riyadh city, tracking system is economically better than fixed angle system. Among the considered tracking systems, VCA system is the most preferable as it has low NPC and LCOE values with a high return on investment (ROI) as well as low carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions due to a high renewable energy penetration.
- Matar, W., Murphy, F., Pierru, A. and Riouxa, B. (2015) Lowering Saudi Arabia’s Fuel Consumption and Energy System Costs without Increasing End Consumer Prices. Energy Economics, 49, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.019
- Ramli, M.A.M., Hiendro, A. and Al-turki, Y.A. (2016) Techno-Economic Energy Analysis of Wind/Solar Hybrid System: Case Study for Western Coastal Area of Saudi Arabia. Renewable Energy, 91, 374-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.071
- Al Garni, H.Z., Awasthi, A. and Ramli, M.A.M. (2018) Optimal Design and Analysis of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic under Different Tracking Systems Using HOMER. Energy Conversion and Management, 155, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.090
- IRENA. REthinking Energy 2017: Accelerating the Global Energy Transformation. http://www.irena.org//media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2017/IRENA_REthinking_Energy _2017.pdf
- Renewables Global Status Report—REN21. (2017). http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/GSR2017_Full-Report.pdf
- Alharthi, Y.Z., Siddiki, M.K. and Chaudhry, G.M. (2017) The New Vision and the Contribution of Solar Power in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Electricity Production. Ninth Annual IEEE Green Technologies Conference (GreenTech), Denver, 29-31 March 2017, 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/GreenTech.2017.18
- Saudi Electricity Company (2017) Annual Reports. https://www.se.com.sa/en-us/Pages/AnnualReports.aspx
- The Electricity & Cogeneration Regulatory Authority (2017). http://www.ecra.gov.sa/en-us/dataandstatistics/pages/DataAndStatistics.aspx
- Zell, E., et al. (2015) Assessment of Solar Radiation Resources in Saudi Arabia. Solar Energy, 119, 422-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.06.031
- Hepbasli, A. and Alsuhaibani, Z. (2011) A Key Review on Present Status and Future Directions of Solar Energy Studies and Applications in Saudi Arabia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 5021-5050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.052
- Ramli, M.A.M., Hiendro, A., Sedraoui, K. and Twaha, S. (2015) Optimal Sizing of Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Energy System in Saudi Arabia. Renewable Energy, 75, 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.028
- Ramli, M.A.M., Twaha, S., Ishaque, K. and Al-Turki, Y.A. (2017) A Review on Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Systems with and without Shading Conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 144-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.013