The Power of Materialist-Environmental Explanations: General and Specific Evolution, and the Incest Taboo
- 1 Retired, Idaho State University, Pocatello, USA
Abstract
The incest taboo has been the subject of much curiosity since the mid-19 th century. While the taboo and its violation have consumed much attention especially concerning the abuse of children , other scholars have focused on the origin of the incest taboo. This focus on origin created a division between those who ascribed to Darwin’s selection theory and those who recognized environmental conditions. In the latter case what has been underdeveloped is an understanding of material ist-environmental theory as a powerful explanation for understanding complex human behaviors. In the following article I will examine the nature of materialist-environmentalism and it s efficacy in explaining sociocultural evolution of human society, the specific evolution of the Hindu taboo against eating beef, and the general sociocultural evolution of the incest taboo, as powerful examples of material-environmental t heory. In conclusion I will survey specifically the origin of the incest taboo through environmental theory.
- Alcock, J. (2003). The Triumph of Sociobiology. New York: Oxford Univerand Genetic Disorder.
- Alvarez, G., Quinteiro, C., & Ceballos, F. C. (2011). Inbreeding and Genetic Disorder. In K. Ikehara (Ed.), Advances in the Study of Genetic Disorders (pp. 21-44). Rijeka: InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/18373
- Bennett, R. L., Motulsky, A. G., Bittles, A., Hudgins, L., & Uhrich, S. (2002). Genetic Counseling and Screening of Consanguineous Couples and Their Offspring: Recommendation of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11, 297-119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014593404915
- Bittles, A. H., & Black, M. L. (2010). Consanguinity, Human Evolution, and Complex Diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 1779-1786. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906079106
- Buzney, C., & Marcoux, J. (2021). Cultural Materialism. https://anthropology.ua.edu/theory/cultural-materialism
- Cohen, Y. (1978). The Disappearance of the Incest Taboo. Human Nature, 1, 72-78.
- Denton, M. (1985). Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, MD: Adler & Adler.
- Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel. The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
- Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse. How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Viking.
- Elwell, F. W. (2013). Harris on the Universal Structure of Society. http://www.faculty.rsu.edu/users/f/felwell/www/Theorists/Essays/Harris1.htm
- Goldschmidt, W. (1959). Man’s Way: A Preface to the Understanding of Human Society. New York: Holt.
- Harris, M. ([1968]2001). The Rise of Anthropological Theory. A History of Theories of Culture. New York: Altamira Press.
- Harris, M. (1974). Cows, Pigs, Wars & Witches. The Riddles of Culture. New York: Random House.
- Harris, M. (1977). Cannibals and Kings. The Origins of Culture. New York: Random House.
- Harris, M. (1979). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. New York: Random House.
- Leavitt, G. C. (1977). The Frequency of Warfare. An Evolutionary Perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 47, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1977.tb00778.x
- Leavitt, G. C. (1986). Ideology and the Materialist Model of General Evolution: A Cross-Cultural Test of Subsystem Relationships. Social Forces, 65, 525-553. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/65.2.525