The main purpose of this study is to determine what kind of effect (emotion) the sense of injustice, which is seen as the structural cause of femicide in Türkiye, leaves in the social memory and what kind of measures such an effect leads to tak ing to prevent femicide. In the study 1 , quantitative (number of tweets-14 , 214 tweets) and qualitative (content of tweets and google questionnaire conducted with 94 people) research methods were used together to analyze the content of the data obtained. Therefore, in the methodology of the study, the texts of the tweets in the sample group were first uploaded to the MAXQDA computer software program, and then justice/injustice, basic principles of justice, reasons for criminal injustice and positive/negative emotions were entered into the system. The main finding of the study is that, due to the violation of basic principles of justice in the Panoptic patriarchal legal system in Türkiye, inadequate sentences given to perpetrators as the representative of Panoptic patriarchal power, on the one hand, encourage other men to resort to lethal violence; on the other hand, it leaves victims (and potential victims) vulnerable to the injustice of condemning them to new victimizations. The third party reacting to this situation is characterized by intense feelings of anger, mistrust, helplessness and sadness, but nevertheless hopeful that justice will be served.
Ahmed, S. (2004). Duyguların Kültürel Politikası (Çev. Komut, S.). Sel.
Aka, A. (2019). Neoliberal Zamanlarda Kadına Yönelik Şiddet. Gece.
Aka, A. (2022). Reflection Patterns of Emotions Left by Fatal Female Violence in Turkey. ATSK Journal of Sociology, 1, 8-22.
Aka, A. (2023). Reading the Panoptic Effects of Femicide through Twitter: The Case Turkey. Sociology Mind, 13, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.4236/sm.2023.131001
Alvazzi del Frate, A. (2011). When the Victim Is a Woman. In Global Burden of Armed Violence: Lethal Encounters (pp. 113-144). GD (Geneva Declaration) Secretariat.
Anit SayaÇ (2023). Şiddetten ölen Kadinlar iÇin Dijital Anit. http://anitsayac.com
Austin, W., & Tobiasen, J. M. (1984). Legal Justice and the Psychology of Conflict Resolution. In R. Folger (Ed.), The Sense of Injustice, Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 227-270). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2683-0_8
Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective Taking: Imagining How Others Feel versus Imagining How You Would Feel. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 751-758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297237008
Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (in) Justice: The Sacred and the Profane. In J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in Organizational Justice (pp. 89-118). Stanford University Press.
Buchbinder, D. (2013). Studying Men and Masculinities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203852224
Connell, R. W. (1998). Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve İktidar (Çev. Soydemir, C.). Ayrinti.
Costantino, R. (2006). Femicide, Impunity, and Citizenship: The Old and New in the Struggle for Justice in Guatemala. Chicana/Latina Studies, 6, 108-121. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23014586
Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., & Nadisic, T. (2011). Social Justice and the Experience of Emotion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203840474
Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive Justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05
Dworkin, A. (1987). Intercourse. Free Press.
Foucault, M. (1992). Hapishanenin Doğuşu (Çev. M. A. KılıÇbay). İmge.
Global Burden of Armed Violence (2008). Chapter Four. Lethal Encounters: Non-Conflict Armed Violence. In Global Burden of Armed Violence: Lethal Encounters (pp. 67-88). GD (Geneva Declaration) Secretariat. http://www.genevadeclaration.org/fileadmin/docs/GBAV/GBAV08-CH4.pdf
Goodrum, S. (2013). Bridging the Gap between Prosecutors’ Cases and Victims’ Biographies in the Criminal Justice System through Shared Emotions. Law & Social Inquiry, 38, 257-287. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24545898 https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12020
Goodrum, S., & Stafford, M. (2003). The Management of Emotions in the Criminal Justice System. Sociological Focus, 36, 179-196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20832202 https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2003.10570723
Hegtvedt, K. A., & Parris, C. L. (2014). Emotions in Justice Processes. In J. E. Stets, & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions: Volume II, Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research (pp. 103-125). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9130-4_6
Hillebrandt, A., & Barclay, L. J. (2013). Integrating Organizational Justice and Affect: New Insights, Challenges, and Opportunities. Social Justice Research, 26, 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-013-0193-z
Homans, G. C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt, Brace and World.
Jasso, G. (2006). Emotion in Justice Processes. In J. E. Stets, & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions (pp. 321-346). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30715-2_15
Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J. Jr., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (pp. 167-218). Springer-Verlag.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4
Lotz, S., Baumert, A., Schlösser, T., Gresser, F., & Fechenhauer, D. (2011). Individual Differences in Third Party Interventions: How Justice Sensitivity Shapes Altruistic Punishment. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 4, 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4716.2011.00084.x
MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press.
Mayer, D. M. (2012). Justice. In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 316-324). Oxford University Press.
Messerschmidt, J. W. (2017). Masculinities and Femicide. Qualitative Sociology Review, 13, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.13.3.05
Minow, M. (2015). Forgiveness, Law, and Justice. California Law Review, 103, 1615-1645.
Nettler, G. (1979). Criminal Justice. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 27-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2945946 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.05.080179.000331
Nowak, M. (2012). Femicide: A Global Problem. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep10614
Ordu, E. (2019). Türkiye’nin Kanayan Yarası: Kadın Cinayetlerinde Katiller Nasıl Ceza İndirimi Alıyor? https://onedio.com/haber/turkiye-nin-kanayan-yarasi-kadin-cinayetlerinde-katiller-nasil-ceza-indirimi-aliyor-859006
Reis, H. T. (1984). The Multidimensionality of Justice. In R. Folger (Ed.), The Sense of Injustice, Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 25-57). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2683-0_2
Roy, J., Bastounis, M. L., & Minibas-Poussard, J. (2012). Interactional Justice and Counter-Productive Work Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Negative Emotions. Social Behavior and Personality, 40, 1341-1356. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.8.1341
Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2002). Femicide and the Palestinian Criminal Justice System: Seeds of Change in the Context of State Building? Law & Society Review, 36, 577-606. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1512163 https://doi.org/10.2307/1512163
Shaw, J. J. A. (2020). Law and the Passions. Why Emotion Matters for Justice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203797709
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Mullen, E. (2008). Morality and Justice: An Expanded Theoretical Perspective and Review. In K. A. Hedgvedt, & J. Clay-Warner (Eds.), Advances in Group Processes (pp. 1-27, Vol. 25). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(08)25001-0
Tusseau, G. (2012). From the Penitentiary to the Political Panoptic Paradigm. In A. Brunon-Ernst (Ed.), New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon (pp. 115-140). Ashgate Publishing Limited. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/canakkale/detail.action
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A Relational Model of Authority in Groups. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X
Wemmers, J. A. (2010). The Meaning of Justice for Victims. In S. G. Shoham, P. Knepper, & M. Kett (Eds.), International Handbook of Victimology (pp. 27-40). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1420085471-c2
Wemmers, J. M., & Cyr, K. (2006). What Fairness Means to Crime Victims: A Social Psychological Perspective on Victim-Off Ender Mediation. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2, 102-128.