The Reconstruction of Sociology in Eastern Europe—Expectations and Dilemmas
- 1 Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Abstract
The article raises two questions: why do sociologists in Western Europe hold expectations of theoretical innovations in sociology in (post-)transitional Eastern European countries, and why is it that sociologists from Eastern Europe do not meet these expectations. The assumption is that these expectations are primarily a response to the theoretical crisis of modern sociology itself, rather than the effect of its knowledge of changes in transitional countries or its willingness to really listen to sociologists from those countries and accept them as equal partners. The attempt to answer the second question involves an analysis of the multilayered reality of sociology in post-socialism, including the loss of the socialist and civil-society utopias which have been replaced by pragmatic endeavors to re-establish a market society and its institutions. Despite the differences between the social situations in the East and West, today’s “Eastern” and “Western” social scientists are confronted by similar global problems and challenges. While the present crisis of the capitalist economy and neo-liberalism certainly has its structural causes, what needs to be questioned here are the very assumptions underlying the world order and the key mechanisms of its functioning.
- Bartelson, J. (2006). Making Sense of Global Civil Society. European Journal of International Relations, 3, 371-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067348
- Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. Institutionalized Individualism and Its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
- Berger, P. (2002). Whatever Happened to Sociology? First Things, 126, 27-29.
- Buroway, M. (1999). Afterword. In K. Verdery, & M. Burawoy (Eds.), Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World (pp. 301-312). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Buroway, M. (2001). Neoclassical Sociology: From the End of Communism to the End of Classes. The American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1099-1120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/320299
- Buroway, M. (2009). The Extended Case Method. Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Cole, S. (2001). Introduction: The Social Construction of Sociology. In S. Cole (Ed.), What’s Wrong with Sociology (pp. 7-36). New Brunswick: Transaction Publ.
- Eyal, G., Szelény, I., & Townsley, E. (2001). Making Capitalism without Capitalist. The New Ruling Elites in Eastern Europe. New York: Verso.
- Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: The Free Press.
- Giddens, A. (2006). A Call to Arms. The Guardian, 26 November 2006.
- Howard, M. M. (2003). The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840012
- Keen, M., & Mucha, J. (2004). Sociology in Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s: A Decade of Reconstruction. European Societies, 6, 123-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616690410001690736
- Killingsworth, M. (2012). Civil Society in Communist Eastern Europe. Colchester: ECPR.
- Kolko, G. (2006). After Socialism: Reconstructing Critical Social Thought. London: Routledge.
- Lengyel, G. (2004). On the Origin and Variety of Problems in Current Central and East-European Sociology (a Reflection on the Article of Keen and Mucha). European Societies, 6, 149-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616690410001690691
- Mason, D. S. (1992). Revolution in East-Central Europe: The Rise and Fall of Communism and the Cold War. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.