Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterotomy: A Mini-Invasive Option for Ureteral Stones
- 1 Medical and Surgical Center of Urology, Douala, Cameroon
- 2 Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Surgery and Specialities, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
- 3 Medical and Surgical Center of Urology, Douala, Cameroon
- 4 Higher Medical and Technology Institute, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
- 5 Medical and Surgical Center of Urology, Douala, Cameroon
- 6 Coordinator Urology Residency Program, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde, Yaounde, Cameroon
Abstract
Background and Objective: Laparoscopy can be an alternative modality in the management of ureteral stones. We herein present our experience with laparoscopic ureterolithotomy although most ureteral stones are managed using endourologic techniques, open surgery, or shockwave lithotripsy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed from January 2014 to December 2019 on 20 patients with ureteral stones who were treated using transperitoneal laparoscopic access. We collected data on patients’ ages, genders, clinical profiles, relevant medical history, sizes of the calculi, localisation of the calculi as confirmed by imaging, and outcome of lithotripsy. Continu ous data were presented as mean values and standard deviations (for normally distributed data) and medians with interquartile ranges (for skewed data). Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages. Results: We included 20 patients (13 males and 7 females) with a mean age of 40.40 ± 13.25 years. The mean stone size was 18.5 ± 3.05 mm and all procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 96 ± 22.34 minute s. The mean estimated blood loss was less than 150 ml, and none of the patients received a blood transfusion. There was no intraoperative complication or postoperative complications, except for leakage of urine in the suture area. The mean hospital stay was 2.05 ± 0.69 days and the double J stent was removed after an average of 20 days post-operatively. The stone-free rate was 100% and after a mean follow-up period of 3 months, there was no stone recurrence. Conclusion: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is an effective and safe technique in the management of ureteric stones. The benefits of this technique include minimal postoperative morbidity, short postoperative hospitalization, a short convalescence period, and remarkable cosmetic results.
- Fontenelle, L.F. and Sarti, T.D. (2019) Kidney Stones: Treatment and Prevention. American Family Physician, 99, 490-496.
- Pearle, M.S., Goldfarb, D.S., Assimos, D.G., Curhan, G., Denu-Ciocca, C.J., Matlaga, B.R., et al. (2014) Medical Management of Kidney Stones: AUA Guideline. The Journal of Urology, 192, 316-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006
- Assimos, D., Krambeck, A., Miller, N.L., Monga, M., Murad, M.H., Nelson, C.P., et al. (2016) Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. The Journal of Urology, 196, 1153-1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
- Bai, Y., Tang, Y., Deng, L., Wang, X., Yang, Y., Wang, J., et al. (2017) Management of Large Renal Stones: Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. BMC Urology, 17, Article No. 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7
- Wang, X., Li, S., Liu, T., Guo, Y. and Yang, Z. (2013) Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy Compared to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy as Surgical Management for Large Renal Pelvic Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Urology, 190, 888-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.092
- Mandhani, A. and Kapoor, R. (2009) Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for Lower Ureteric Stones: Steps to Make It a Simple Procedure. Indian J Urol. Journal of the Urological Society of India, 25, 140-142. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.45556
- Salvadó, J.A., Guzmán, S., Trucco, C.A. and Parra, C.A. (2009) Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy: Optimizing Surgical Technique. Journal of Endourology, 23, 575-578. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0582
- Stein, R.J., Turna, B., Nguyen, M.M., Aron, M., Hafron, J.M., Gill, I.S., et al. (2008) Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty with Concomitant Pyelolithotomy: Technique and Outcomes. Journal of Endourology, 22, 1251-1256. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0003
- Meria, P., Milcent, S., Desgrandchamps, F., Mongiat-Artus, P., Duclos, J.M. and Teillac, P. (2005) Management of Pelvic Stones Larger than 20 mm: Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? Urologia Internationalis, 75, 322-326. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089167
- Tiwari, K., Upadhaya, A.M., Kuwar, A. and Shrestha, S.B. (2019) Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy for the Management of Ureteric Calculi: Our Experience and Complication Encountered. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 17, 233-237. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.1696