The Use of the V.A.C. RX-4 for Multiple Soft Tissue Wound Application in the Single Patient: A Case Report
- 1 Medical Student IV, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- 2 Surgical Resident, The Arrowhead Surgical Residency, Glendale, Arizona
- 3 Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler, USA
- 4 Business Development Manager, Saint Paul, US
- 5 University of Arizona & Creighton University Schools of Medicine, The Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix, Arizona
- 6 Trauma Wound Care, UT Health East, Tyler, USA
- 7 Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, USA
Abstract
Contact burn injuries account for a considerable proportion of admissions that frequently require debridement. Such debridements of these multiple open wounds might benefit from the application of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the removal of proinflammatory mediators and to promote granulation tissue with macrostrain and microstrain. Having four or more Vacuum Assist Closure (V.A.C.) Ulta devices connected to the same patient for adequate wound coverage is cumbersome in the management of the patient’s wound care and tethers the patient to the bed. The V.A.C. RX-4 is a multichannel device that can deliver NPWT with a smaller footprint. In addition, the V.A.C. RX-4 has a weight of 16 lbs. versus one V.A.C Ulta which is 7.4 lbs. Therefore, collectively, four V.A.C. Ultas would equal 29.6 lbs. or almost double the weight of a single V.A.C. RX-4. Use of the V.A.C. RX-4 by healthcare providers can mean greater mobility for the patient and easier transport between patient destinations within the hospital. This case report demonstrates the utility of the V.A.C. RX-4 for open and freshly debrided, large soft tissue wounds in a burn patient.
- Harrington, W.Z., Strohschein, B.L., Reedy, D., Harrington, J.E. and Schiller, W.R. (1995) Pavement Temperature and Burns: Streets of Fire. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 26, 563-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70005-6
- Kowal-Vern, A., Matthews, M.R., Richey, K.N., Ruiz, K., Peck, M., Jain, A. and Foster, K.N. (2019) “Streets of Fire” Revisited: Contact Burns. Burns & trauma, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-019-0169-9
- Banwell, P.E. and Musgrave, M. (2004) Topical Negative Pressure Therapy: Mechanisms and Indications. International Wound Journal: Review, 1, 95-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4801.2004.00031.x
- Ibrahim, Z.M., Waked, I.S. and Ibrahim, O. (2019) Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation in Wound Healing in Burns. Journal of Wound Care, 28, 214-219. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2019.28.4.214
- Saaiq, M., Hameed-Ud-Din, K.M. and Chaudhery, S.M. (2010) Vacuum-Assisted Closure Therapy as a Pretreatment for Split Thickness Skin Grafts. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan, 20, 675-679.
- Seswandhana, M.R., Anzhari, S., Dachlan, I., Wirohadidjojo, Y.W. and Aryandono, T. (2020) A Case Series of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy as a Promising Treatment in Patients with Burn Injury. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, 69, 64-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.03.034
- DeKruff, D. (2016) Multichannel Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Vacuum Assisted Closure. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1021863.pdf
- (2019) KCI Introduces Latest Advancement in Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Designed Specifically for Multiple Traumatic Wounds. International Wound Journal, 16, 313-315.