Totally Endoscopic (Thoracoscopic and Laparoscopic) Radical Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction through a Small Neck Incision: An Early Experience with Thirty Egyptian Patients
- 1 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 3 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 4 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 5 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 6 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 7 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 8 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
- 9 Department of Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center (OCMU), Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Minimally invasive esophagectomy nowadays is replacing the classic open technique. Additional studies are needed to confirm its safety and efficacy. Methods: thirty patients with esophageal carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and they underwent thoracoscopic and laparoscopic procedures for assessment of resectability. Resectablepatients underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction through a four-cm neck incision. Results: 17 patients were operable and 13 patients were inoperable. The mean operative time for the whole procedure was 5.97 ± 1.66 hours. The mean blood loss was 250 ± 138.07 cc. The mean overall hospital stay was 17.47 ± 5.49 daysdays. Common postoperative complications included pneumonia (13.3%) pleural effusion (6.7%), cervical anastomotic leakage (10%), and wound infection (13.3%). One patient died in the early postoperative period. Conclusions: we conclude that totallyendoscopic (thoracoscopic and laparoscopic) esophagectomy is feasible and relatively safe technique. Beside its efficacy as an assessment tool, total esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy could be performed in the same time.
- Ferlay, J., Shin, H.R., Bray, F., Forman, D., Mathers, C. and Parkin, D.M. (2010) Estimates of Worldwide Burden of Cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer, 127, 2893-2917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
- Holmes, R.S. and Vaughan, T.L. (2007) Epidemiology and Pathogenesis of Esophageal Cancer. Seminars in Radiation Oncology, 17, 2-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2006.09.003
- Wei, J.T. and Shaheen, N. (2003) The Changing Epidemiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Seminars in Gastrointestinal Disease, 14, 112-27.
- Lerut, T., Coosemans, W., De Leyn, P., Van Raemdonck, D., Nafteux, P. and Moons, J. (2001) Optimizing Treatment of Carcinoma of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, 10, 863-884.
- Akiyama, H., Tsurumaru, M., Udagawa, H. and Kajiyama, Y. (1994) Radical Lymph Node Dissection for Cancer of the Thoracic Esophagus. Annals of Surgery, 220, 364-372; Discussion 372-363.
- Cuschieri, A., Shimi, S. and Banting, S. (1992) Endoscopic Oesophagectomy through a Right Thoracoscopic Approach. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 37, 7-11.
- Ben-David, K., Sarosi, G.A., Cendan, J.C., Howard, D., Rossidis, G. and Hochwald, S.N. (2012) Decreasing Morbidity and Mortality in 100 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Esophagectomies. Surgical Endoscopy, 26, 162-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1846-3
- Dantoc, M.M., Cox, M.R. and Eslick, G.D. (2012) Does Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (Mie) Provide for Comparable Oncologic Outcomes to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery: Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 16, 486-494.
- Benzoni, E., Terrosu, G., Bresadola, V., Uzzau, A., Intini, S., Noce, L., Cedolini, C., Bresadola, F. and De Anna, D. (2004) A Comparative Study of the Transhiatal Laparoscopic Approach versus Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilisation and Right Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Management. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, 16, 395-401.
- Elewa, H.H. (2010) Potentialities of Water Resources Pollution of the Nile River Delta, Egypt. The Open Hydrology Journal, 4, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874378101004010001
- Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, L. and Zhao, Y. (2011) Comparison of Open Three-Field and Minimally-Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 12, 366-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2010.258632