The Effect of Clinical Pathway in Patients with Acute Complicated Appendicitis
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital, Chongqing, China
- 2 Department of General Surgery, Chongqing Three Gorges Central Hospital, Chongqing, China
Abstract
Clinical pathway (CP) is a medical management tool made by a group of medical specialists and specialized for certain diseases. It has been proved that CP was an efficient way to optimize the hospitalization management and control medical cost. In this paper, we focused on the effect of CP in the patients with acute complicated appendicitis via total duration of hospitalization, hospitalization time before operation, total cost of hospitalization and drug expenditure. From March 2014 to March 2015, the patients with conditions of appendicitis in Three Gorges Central Hospital of Wanzhou, Chongqing, were divided into CP group and non path control group to analyze the effect of the application of CP. Our data showed that there were no significant differences between two groups of patients in total duration of hospitalization, hospitalization time before operation, total cost of hospitalization and drug expenditure. The implementation of CP neither decreased the time of patients in hospital nor the total hospitalization cost. Besides, application of CP for acute appendicitis patients should distinguish between simple appendicitis and complicated appendicitis, simple appendectomy patients implement CP is beneficial, and patients with complicated appendicitis did not come from the benefit.
- Cappendijk, V.C. and Hazebroek, F.W. (2000) The Impact of Diagnostic Delay on the Course of Acute Appendicitis. Archives of Diseases in Childhood, 83, 64-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.83.1.64
- Warner, B.W., Kulick, R.M., Stoops, M.M., Mehta, S., Stephan, M. and Kotagal, U.R. (1998) An Evidenced-Based Clinical Pathway for Acute Appendicitis Decreases Hospital Duration and Cost. Journal of Pediatrics Surgery, 33, 1371-1375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90010-0
- Firilas, A.M., Higginbotham, P.H., Johnson, D.D., Jackson, R.J., Wagner, C.W. and Smith, S.D. (1999) A New Economic Benchmark for Surgical Treatment of Appendicitis. The American Surgeon, 65, 769-773.
- Jones, P.F. (2001) Suspected Acute Appendicitis: Trends in Management over 30 Years. British Journal of Surgery, 88, 1570-1577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01910.x
- Rao, P.M., Rhea, J.T., Novelline, R.A. and McCabe, C.J. (1998) The Computed Tomography Appearance of Recurrent and Chronic Appendicitis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 16, 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-6757(98)90060-2
- Savrin, R.A., Clausen, K., Martin Jr., E.W. and Cooperman, M. (1979) Chronic and Recurrent Appendicitis. The American Journal of Surgery, 137, 355-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(79)90066-7
- Eriksson, S. and Granstrom, L. (1995) Randomized Controlled Trial of Appendectomy versus Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Appendicitis. British Journal of Surgery, 82, 166-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820207
- Cobben, L.P., de Van Otterloo, A.M. and Puylaert, J.B. (2000) Spontaneously Resolving Appendicitis: Frequency and Natural History in 60 Patients. Radiology, 215, 349-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma08349
- McDonald, G.P., Pendarvis, D.P., Wilmoth, R. and Daley, B.J. (2001) Influence of Preoperative Computed Tomography on Patients Undergoing Appendectomy. The American Surgeon, 67, 1017-1021.
- Ford, R.D., Passinault, W.J. and Morse, M.E. (1994) Diagnostic ultrasound for suspected appendicitis: does the added cost produce a better outcome? The American Surgeon, 60, 895-898.
- Cash, G. and Frazee, R. (2012) Improvements in Laparoscopic Treatment for Complicated Appendicitis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques A, 22, 581-583.
- Wang, S.M., Huang, F.C., Wu, C.H., et al. (2010) Ileocecal Burkitt’s Lymphoma Presenting as Lleocolic Intussusception with Appendieeal Invagination and Acute Appendicitis. Journal of Formosan Medical Association, 109, 476-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(10)60080-0