Assessment of Extent and Severity of Pellet Induced Abdominal Injuries, a Rare Variant of Weapon Violence: A Prospective Study
- 1 Government Medical College, Srinagar, India
- 2 Government Medical College, Srinagar, India
- 3 Government Medical College, Srinagar, India
- 4 Government Medical College, Srinagar, India
- 5 Government Medical College, Srinagar, India
- 6 Government Medical College, Srinagar, India
Abstract
Background: The use of a Pellet gun, a form of s hort gun used for mob control in many conflict zones , has posed a serious challenge to the surgeons in assessing the extent of trauma caused by these pellets. Objectives: To study the role of conventional available investigations for trauma like ultrasonography and computed tomography scans in assessing the severity of the injuries caused by the pellets. Methodology: 50 patients having pellet injuries predominantly in abdomen without other associated trauma were included in the study. The decision for surgery was taken on the basis of clinical and CECT (Contrast Enhanced Computed Tomography) findings and these findings were then compared with intra-operative findings. Results: 30/50 patients were decided to be operated on the basis of Clinical and CECT findings. On exploration, it was observed that 18/33 patients really needed exploration while as 15/33 patients could have been managed conservatively. This was observed in next 20/50 patients who were put on conservative management with similar CECT findings. Of these 20 patients, 17 did well while as 3 were explored later in view of developing peritonitis and were found to have small bowel perforations. Conclusion: Conventional investigations for trauma like FAST and CECT abdomen are not ideal for assessing the severity of pellet induced abdominal visceral injuries which result in high rate of unnecessary laparotomies. Also the abdominal pellet trauma patients can be well managed conservatively until hemodynamically stable even though CT scan shows pellet penetration into peritoneal cavity or bowel lumen.
- Dar, A.M., Ahanger, A.G., Wani, R.A., Bhat, M.A., Lone, G.N., et al. (2003) Popliteal Artery Injuries: The Kashmir Experience. Journal of Trauma, 55, 362-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000052369.46364.4F
- Bell, M.J. (1971) The Management of Shotgun Wounds. Journal of Trauma, 11, 522-527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197106000-00010
- Mushtaque, M., Mir, M.F., Bhat, M., Parray, F.Q., Khanday, S.A., Dar, R.A. and Malik, A.A. (2012) Pellet Gunfire Injuries among Agitated Mobs in Kashmir. Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery, 18, 255-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2012.47639
- Hegazy, T.O., et al. (2015) Assessment of the Management and Outcomes of Penetrating Abdominal Shotgun Injuries. International Surgery Journal, 2, 12-19.
- Renz, B. and Feliciano, D.V. (1995) Unnecessary Laparotomies for Trauma: A Prospective Study of Morbidity. Journal of Trauma, 38, 350-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199503000-00007
- Demetriades, D., Charalambides, D., Lakhoo, M. and Pantanowitz, D. (1991) Gunshot Wound of the Abdomen: Role of Selective Conservative Management. British Journal of Surgery, 78, 220-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800780230
- Bond, S.J., Schnier, G.C. and Miller, F.B. (1996) Air-Powered Guns: Too Much Firepower to Be a Toy. Journal of Trauma, 41, 674-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199610000-00013
- Chamisa, I. (2008) Civilian Abdominal Gunshot Wounds in Durban South Africa: A Prospective Study of 78 Cases. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 90, 581-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588408X301118