Imperfect Quality Certification in Lemons Markets
- 1 School of Business, University of California Riverside, Riverside, USA
- 2 School of Business, University of California Riverside, Riverside, USA
- 3 Department of Marketing, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
Abstract
In markets with information asymmetry, the seller of a high-quality product is unable to credibly communicate its quality to buyers and is forced to price like an average quality seller. This is a disincentive to provide quality and high-quality sellers may exit the market. Of several methods to reduce information asymmetry, we provide an analytical study of certification or grading of quality levels by infomediaries. In the equilibrium of a quality reporting game, we find that certification reduces, but does not eliminate, the problems of information asymmetry. There exists a threshold, determined by the accuracy of the certification process, below which customers should believe quality reports, but disbelieve reports above it. We further examine a two-category scheme of high/low quality certification and discuss the design of certification grades using an entropy approach.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
- Baranchuk, N., & Prasad, A. (2017). Making the Grade: Product Quality Reporting by Infomediaries. University of Texas at Dallas Working Paper.
- Chen, L., Peng, J., Liu, Z., & Zhao, R. (2017). Pricing and Effort Decisions for a Supply Chain with Uncertain Information. International Journal of Production Research, 55, 264-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1204475
- Chen, X., Yu, H., & Yu, F. (2015). What Is the Optimal Number of Response Alternatives for Rating Scales? From an Information Processing Perspective. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 3, 69-78. https://doi.org/10.1057/jma.2015.4
- Dubey, P., & Geanakoplos, J. (2010). Grading Exams: 100, 99, 98... or A, B, C? Games and Economic Behavior, 69, 72-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.02.001
- Eliashberg, J., & Shugan, S. M. (1997). Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors? Journal of Marketing, 61, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100205
- Harbaugh, R., & Rasmusen, E. (2018). Coarse Grades: Informing the Public by Withholding Information. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 10, 210-235. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20130078
- Heinkel, R. (1981). Uncertain Product Quality: The Market for Lemons with an Imperfect Testing Technology. Bell Journal of Economics, 12, 625-636. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003577
- Iyer, G., & Soberman, D. (2000). Markets for Product Modification Information. Marketing Science, 19, 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.3.203.11801
- Jamal, K., & Sunder, S. (2011). Is Mandated Independence Necessary for Audit Quality? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 284-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.03.001
- Jin, G., & Leslie, P. (2003). The Effects of Information on Product Quality: Evidence from Restaurant Hygiene Grade Cards. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 11, 409-451. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303321675428
- Leland, H. E. (1979). Quacks, Lemons and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1328-1346. https://doi.org/10.1086/260838
- Li, Z., Chen, L., & Nan, G. (2018). Small-Scale Renewable Energy Source Trading: A Contract Theory Approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14, 1491-1500. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2776241