The Third Equilibrium: The Economic Impact of Future and the Model of Multidimensional Equilibrium
- 1 Shenzhen Mongoose Consulting Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China
- 2 Shenzhen Mongoose Consulting Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China
- 3 Shenzhen Mongoose Consulting Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, China
Abstract
Based on the consideration of the impact of current and local economic activities on the future and whole society, this paper takes factors such as time, space, opportunity and equity into analysis framework, and establishes a new equilibrium system-multidimensional equilibrium. Then, combining the theory of multidimensional equilibrium and revenue-cost analysis, a multidimensional equilibrium model is constructed. This model provides a tool for evaluating the social and economic activities more intuitive and scientific. Finally, in order to verify the effectiveness and universality of the multidimensional equilibrium theory and model, this paper selects three representative examples of economic activities from the macro level, the medium level and the micro level respectively, and applies the multidimensional equilibrium theory to evaluate the economic activities at different levels through the actual data. This study shows that, considering the future total revenue and total cost of economic activities from the dimension of time and space, with time goes on, most of the social total revenue of economic activities and the ratio of total cost increase after decreasing first. This tells that in the short-term future, the total revenue of some economic activities may be greater than the total cost, while in the long-term future, the total revenue is less than the total cost. Therefore, from the perspective of the long-term development, the development planning of a country should give more consideration to the multidimensional equilibrium, especially taking account of the future risks.
- Henry, J. (1983). Mathematical Sciences. The British Journal for the History of Science, 17, 232-233.
- Marshall, A. (2006). Principles of Economics: Abridged Edition. New York: Cosimo Classics.
- Mill, J. S. (2004). Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
- Murray, M., & Stimson, S. C. (1996). The Figure of Smith: Dugald Stewart and the Propagation of Smithian Economics. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 3, 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10427719600000024
- Nash, J. (1950a). Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 36, 48-49. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
- Nash, J. (1950b). The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 18, 155-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907266
- Nash, J. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529
- Nash, J. (1953). Two-Person Cooperative Games. Econometrica, 21, 128-140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906951
- Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (1994). Theory of Games and Economic Bebavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton U Press.
- Pang, B. Q., & Wang, D. Z. (2016). Officials’ Tenure System and Economic Performance. China Economic Studies, No. 1, 14-24.
- Geng, S., & Pang, B. Q. (2016). Term of Local Cadres and the Behavior of Local Governments. China Economy Quarterly, 15, 893-916.
- Smith, A. (2003). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Bantam Classics.
- Walras (1989). Elements of Pure Economics (The Chinese Translation, Trans. Cai Shoubai). Beijing: Commercial Press.
- Wang, Y. T. (2018). Enlightenment of Nobel Prize Winner Theory to Green Sustainable Development of China’s Economy. Financial Times, No. 4, 10-20.
- Xiao, Z. P., & Duan, N. N. (2008). Who Will Pay Attention to the Tenure of the Chairman? Board of Directors, No. 5, 78-80.