Is Agriculture the Highest-Risk Sector? A Determination Using Congolese Data
- 1 Economic and Social Research and Study Laboratory (LARES), Marien N’Gouabi University of Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo
- 2 Economic and Social Research and Study Laboratory (LARES), Marien N’Gouabi University of Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo
- 3 Economic and Social Research and Study Laboratory (LARES), Marien N’Gouabi University of Brazzaville, Brazzaville, Congo
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to determine the extent of agricultural risk in terms of sectoral risk in the Congo. By applying information asymmetry theory to the banking industry, we postulate that the risk associated with the agricultural sector is not the highest of sectoral risks. The application of the IRISK method produces results that show that, in the Congo, the agricultural sector is indeed not the riskiest of the economic sectors; rather, it is the “wholesale and retail trade, restaurants and hotels” and then “transport, activities of transport auxiliaries and telecommunications” sectors that are the most risky. These results, which are in line with theoretical predictions, imply that it is still possible to consistently finance agriculture provided that Congolese banks change their “negative” perception of this sector.
- Bardos, M., & Plihon, D. (1999). Détection des secteurs risqués-La méthode IRISK. Bulletin de la Banque de France, 69, Septembre.
- Brulé-Francoise, A., Rozières, C., & Torre, C. (2016). Le crédit à l’agriculture, un outil clé du développement agricole. FARM Note n° 9, Juillet 2016.
- Cervantes-Godoy, D., & Dewbre, J. (2010). Economic Importance of Agriculture for Poverty Reduction. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers No. 23, Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Chevalier-Farat, T. (1992). Pourquoi les banques? Bilans et essais. Revue d’économie politique, 102, 633-685.
- Concina, L. (2014). Attitude face au risque et sciences économiques. Toulouse: Fondation pour une culture de sécurité industrielle (Foncsi), n°02.
- Diamond, D., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance and Liquidity. Journal of Political Economics, 91, 401-419. https://doi.org/10.1086/261155
- Dufumier, M. (1999). La prise en compte des risques dans la définition des politiques de développement agricole. In Le risque en agriculture (sous la direction de Michel Eldin et Pierre Milleville) (pp. 547-560). Paris: édition de l’ORSTOM. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.irdeditions.16281
- FAO (2012). Financement du secteur agricole.
- Fouquet, B. (2014). Pour un développement du crédit à l’agriculture: L’option du mutualisme. Point de vue, n°3, novembre.
- Gurley, J., & Shaw, E. (1960). Money in a Theory of Finance. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
- Jessop, R., Diallo, B., Duursma, M., Mallek, A., Harms, J., & Manen, B. (2012). Assurer l’accès à la finance agricole. Conclusions d’une étude horizontale couvrant le Cambodge, le Mali, le Sénégal, la Tanzanie, la Thailande et la Tunisie. Agence Francaise de Développement. A savoir, n°14, Décembre.
- Keeton, W., & Morris, C. S. (1987). Why Do Banks’ Loan Losses Differ? Economic Review, 72, 3-21.
- Louzis, D. P., Vouldis, A. T., & Metaxas, V. L. (2012). Macroeconomic and Bank-Specific Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in Greece: A Comparative Study of Mortgage, Business and Consumer Loan Portfolios. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 1012-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.012
- Maudos, J., Pérez, F., & Quesada, J. (2005). Do Banks Discriminate Sectoral Real Investment? Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA), Paper No. 15868.