Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence of Countercyclical Macroeconomic Policies Implemented during the Subprime and COVID-19 Crises: The Brazilian Case
- 1 National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brasília, Brazil
- 2 State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil
- 3 Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Abstract
This article analyses, theoretically and empirically, the countercyclical economic policies, in particular the fiscal and monetary ones, implemented by the Brazilian Economic Authorities (BEAs) in response to the International Financial Crisis (IFC), 2007-2008, and the COVID-19 crisis, 2020. The main objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of those policies not only in times of economic growth, but mainly in periods of economic crisis. This idea is in line with the main arguments of Keynesian macroeconomics, which supports the theoretical framework of the article. The empirical analysis of the article shows the effects of fiscal (government spending) and monetary (interest rate) policies in the Brazilian economy between 1996 and 2020. Thus, it was estimated a MS-VAR model to analyze the impacts of fiscal and monetary policies in periods of economic growth and economic crisis. The main results indicate that the effects of fiscal and monetary policies are more pronounced during a period of economic crisis than in a situation of economic growth, supporting, thus, the Keynesian arguments that fiscal and monetary policies are able to affect the economic cycles.
- Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2013). Policies for Full Employment and Low Inflation. In P. Arestis, & M. Sawyer (Eds.), Economic and Monetary Union Macroeconomic Policies: Current Practices and Alternatives (pp. 144-167). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137317896_7
- Artis, M., Canova, F., Gali, J., Giavazzi, F., Portes, R., Reichlin, L., Uhlig, H., & Weil, P. (2003). Business Cycle Dating Committee of the Centre for Economic Policy Research. In Proceedings CEPR. Findings September 22, Washington/DC.
- Auerbach, A., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012). Measuring the Output Responses to Fiscal Policy. American Economic Journal—Economic Policy, 4, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.2.1
- Auerbach, A., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2013). Fiscal Multipliers in Recession and Expansion. In A. Alesina, & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Fiscal Policy after the Financial Crisis (pp. 63-98). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.3386/w19911
- Auerbach, A., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2017). Fiscal Stimulus and Fiscal Sustainability. NBER Working Paper # 23789. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23789
- Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1329-1368. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043
- Central Bank of Brazil (CBB) (2021). Acompanhamento de medidas de combate ao Covid 19. https://www.bcb.gov.br/acessoinformacao/acompanhamento_covid19
- Enders, W. (2010). Applied Econometric Time Series. John Wiley.
- Ferrari Filho, F., & Conceição, O. (2005). The Concept of Uncertainty in Post Keynesian Theory and in Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 39, 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2005.11506835
- Gorodnichenko, Y. (2014). Discussion of Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Badimes: Evidence from U.S. Historical Data by Valerie Ramey and Sarah Zubairy. In NBER Economic Fluctuations and Growth Summer Meeting. Cambridge.
- Instituto Nacional de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2021a). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílio Contínua (PNAD Contínua). https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/multidominio/condicoes-de-vida-desigualdade- e-pobreza/9171-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de-domicilios- continua-mensal.html?edicao=27233&t=destaques
- Instituto Nacional de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2021b). Sistema de Contas Nacionais. https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/contas-nacionais/9052-sistema- de-contas-nacionais-brasil.html?=&t=resultados