The Equity-Efficiency Conflict: Improving Pareto’s Optimality Doctrine
- 1 Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- 2 Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- 3 Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Abstract
A central issue in Public Economics is the appropriate design of a tax system that will succeed in reconciling the concepts of equity and efficiency. In the present study, the standard assumption of the household’s utility being dependent on consumption (income) and labour (leisure) is adopted to arrive at a decision as to the nature of distortions and the fiscal measures required to eliminate them. The comparison of a utility function (with consumption and labour being treated as exogenous), that causes no distortions, with another utility function (with consumption depending on indirect taxes and labour supply on income taxes), that generates distortions, allows us to carry out a number of econometric, mathematical, and empirical tests, designed to redress the balance between the MRS and the MRT and to eliminate the distortions originating in the labour market and/or the commodities market.
- Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive Politics and Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 465-490. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118470
- Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on Finance. McGraw-Hill.
- Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). The Design of Tax Structure: Direct versus Indirect Taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 6, 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(76)90041-4
- Barro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726
- Barro, R. J. (1999). Inequality, Growth, and Investment. NBER Working Papers 7038. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7038
- Bird, R. M. (1992). Tax Policy and Economic Development. Johns Hopkins Press.
- Chiappori, P.-A., & Mazzocco, M. (2017). Static and Intertemporal Household Decisions. Journal of Economic Literature, 55, 985-1045. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20150715
- Dawson, J. W. (1998). Institutions, Investment, and Growth: New Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence. Economic Inquiry, 36, 603-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01739.x
- Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996). A New Data Set Measuring Income Inequality. The World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565-591. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/10.3.565
- Farhi, E., & Gabaix, X. (2020). Optimal Taxation with Behavioral Agents. American Economic Review, 110, 298-336. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151079
- Forbes, K. J. (2000). A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth. American Economic Review, 90, 869-887. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.869
- Gayle, G.-L., & Shephard, A. (2019). Optimal Taxation, Marriage, Home Production, and Family Labor Supply. Econometrica, 87, 291-326. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14528
- Grier, K. B., & Tullock, G. (1989). An Empirical Analysis of Cross-National Economic Growth, 1951-1980. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24, 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90006-8
- Jencks, C. (1972). Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. Basic Books.
- Kormendi, R. C., & Meguire, P. G. (1985). Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(85)90027-3