A Note on Partner Heterogeneity and Strict Nash Networks
- 1 Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea
Abstract
This note extends the studies on the impacts of partner heterogeneity in two-way flow Strict Nash network of ( Billand et al., 2011 ) by allowing for the existence of small information decay. I show that the incorporation of small information decay does not change the results of this aforementioned paper: every Strict Nash network is a minimally connected Bi or branching network. Since the studies on the roles of partner heterogeneity by this aforementioned paper are limited to the assumption that link formation is unilateral, I also propose another extension that studies the roles of partner heterogeneity in a more general model of network formation proposed by ( Olaizola and Valenciano, 2015 ), which allows link formation to be both unilateral and bilateral. I show that the inclusion of partner heterogeneity breaks away a major result in this aforementioned paper: Nash network no longer consists of at most one nontrivial strongly full subnetwork.
- Bala, V., & Goyal, S. (2000). A Noncooperative Model of Network Formation. Econometrica, 68, 1181-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00155
- Billand, P., Bravard, C., & Sarangi, S. (2011). Strict Nash Networks and Partner Heterogeneity. International Journal of Game Theory, 40, 515-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-010-0252-8
- Billand, P., Bravard, C., & Sarangi, S. (2012). Existence of Nash Networks and Partner Heterogeneity. Mathematical Social Sciences, 64, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.01.001
- Charoensook, B. (2019). Bi and Branching Strict Nash Networks in Two-Way Flow Models: A Generalized Sufficient Condition. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics, 20, Article ID: 20180117. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejte-2018-0117
- De Jaegher, K., & Kamphorst, J. (2015). Minimal Two-Way Flow Networks with Small Decay. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 109, 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.010
- Galeotti, A., Goyal, S., & Kamphorst, J. (2006). Network Formation with Heterogeneous Players. Game and Economic Behavior, 54, 353-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2005.02.003
- Granovetter, M. (2018). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. University of Chicago Press.
- Jackson, M. O., & Wolinsky, A. (1996). A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 71, 44-74. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.0108
- Katz, E., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Roper, E. (2017). Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126234
- Olaizola, N., & Valenciano, F. (2015). Unilateral vs. Bilateral Link-Formation: A Transition without Decay. Mathematical Social Sciences, 74, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2014.12.002
- Olaizola, N., & Valenciano, F. (2018). A Unifying Model of Strategic Network Formation. International Journal of Game Theory, 47, 1033-1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-017-0592-8
- Unlu, E. (2018). Efficient Networks in Models with Player and Partner Heterogeneity. The Manchester School, 86, 100-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.12196