Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Group Lending with Peer Selection and Moral Hazard
Department of Economics, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA
International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA
International Food Policy Research Institute and Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
- 1 Department of Economics, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA
- 2 International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC, USA
- 3 International Food Policy Research Institute and Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Theoretical Economics Letters·Volume 12 (2022)·Pages 1351–1361·Published 8 September 2022·DOI10.4236/tel.2022.125074
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The theory on group lending suggests that joint liability induces borrowers to form homogeneous groups based on their risk types, which alleviates adverse selection and contributes to the success of microcredit schemes. We extend this theory by allowing individuals to differ both in their exogenous risk type and in their endogenous effort level. We find that joint liability leads to positive assortative matching in both a non-cooperative and cooperative game setting. Groups of safe borrowers additionally exhibit higher effort levels, which reinforces their likelihood of repayment as opposed to risky groups.
KeywordsGroup LendingPeer SelectionMoral HazardMicrofinance
- Ahlin, C. (2020). Group Lending, Matching Patterns, and the Mystery of Microcredit: Evidence from Thailand. Quantitative Economics, 11, 713-759. https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1115
- Armendariz de Aghion, B., & Gollier, C. (2000). Peer Group Formation in an Adverse Selection Model. Economic Journal, 110, 632-643. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00557
- Banerjee, A., Besley, T., & Guinnane, T. (1994). The Neighbor’s Keeper: The Design of a Credit Cooperative with Theory and a Test. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 491-515. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118471
- Becker, G. (1993). A Treatise on the Family. Harvard University Press.
- Chowdury, P. R. (2005). Group Lending: Sequential Financing, Lending Monitoring and Joint Liability. Journal of Development Economics, 77, 415-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.05.005
- Gan, L., Hernandez, M. A., & Liu, Y. (2018). Group Lending with Heterogeneous Types. Economic Inquiry, 56, 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12541
- Ghatak, M. (1999). Group Lending, Local Information, and Peer Selection. Journal of Development Economics, 60, 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00035-8
- Ghatak, M. (2000). Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Effect. Economic Journal, 110, 601-631. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00556
- Ghatak, M., & Guinnane, T. W. (1999). The Economics of Lending with Joint Liability: Theory and Practice. Journal of Development Economics, 60, 195-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.06.002
- Guttman, J. M. (2008). Assortative Matching, Adverse Selection, and Group Lending. Journal of Development Economics, 87, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.06.002
- Stiglitz, J. (1990). Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets. World Bank Economic Review, 4, 351-366. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/4.3.351
- van Tassel, E. (1999). Group Lending under Asymmetric Information. Journal of Development Economics, 60, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00034-6
- Varian, H. (1990). Monitoring Agents with Other Agents. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 146, 153-174.