Not Enough R&D? Or Maybe Too Much? Intensity of Knowledge Spillovers and Optimal R&D Policy in Schumpeterian Growth Theory
- 1 TBS Business School, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Abstract
This paper presents an endogenous growth model à la Aghion & Howitt (1992) in which we explicitly formalize knowledge spillovers in the innovation process. We revisit the issue of the Pareto non-optimality of the Schumpeterian equilibrium by revealing the part played by the intensity of knowledge spillovers. Basically, we highlight that the market incompleteness characterizing this type of decentralized economy (knowledge is not priced) is all the more likely to lead to an under-optimal (resp. over-optimal) R&D effort as the intensity of knowledge spillovers is high (resp. low). The reason behind this is that the effects of the distortion of R&D incentives resulting from market incompleteness are amplified all the more as this intensity is strong. Complementarily, we derive the optimal tool dedicated to correct the market failure caused by market incompleteness, and we demonstrate that it clearly depends on the intensity of knowledge spillovers: the higher (resp. lower) the intensity of knowledge spillovers is, the more likely this policy tool should consist in a subsidy (resp. tax). Moreover, if this optimal tool happens to be a subsidy, then this subsidy will be all the larger as the intensity is high.
- Acemoglu D (2009) Modern economic growth. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ
- Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323-351
- Aghion P, Howitt P (1998) Endogenous growth theory. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
- Aghion P, Howitt P (2009) The economics of growth. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
- Akcigit U, Hanley D, Serrano-Velarde N (2016) Back to Basics: Basic Research Spillovers, Innovation Policy and Growth. CEPR Discussion Paper No 11707
- Alvarez-Pelaez MJ, Groth C (2005) Too little or too much R&D? European Economic Review 49(2):437-456
- Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (2003) Economic Growth, second edition. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
- Benassy JP (1998) Is there always too little research in endogenous growth with expanding product variety? European Economic Review 42(1):61-69
- Cozzi G, Giordani PE, Zamparelli L (2007) The refoundation of the symmetric equilibrium in Schumpeterian growth models. Journal of Economic Theory 136(1):788-797
- Dinopoulos E, Sener F (2007) New directions in Schumpeterian growth theory. In: Hanusch H, Pyka A (eds) The elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
- Dinopoulos E, Thompson P (1998) Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth 3(4): 313-335
- Garner P (2010) A note on endogenous growth and scale effects. Economics Letters 106(2):98-100
- Gray E, Grimaud A (2016) Using the Salop Circle to Study Scale Effects in Schumpeterian Growth Models: Why Inter-sectoral Knowledge Diffusion Matters. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6021 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2829265)
- Griliches Z (1992) The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94(supplement): 29-47
- Griliches Z (1995) R&D and productivity: econometric results and measurement issues. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technical change, Blackwell Handbooks in Economics
- Grossman G, Helpman E (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies 58(1):43-61
- Hall B (2004) Innovation and diffusion. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) Handbook on innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford