This paper investigates the contribution of e-government and the implementation of digital practices in the daily administrative procedures of the state/ government to the prevention of corruption and the consolidation of transparency in the transactions between citizens and authorities. It focuses in particular on the period 2007-2021, covering the years 2020 and 2021, when the implementation of digital practices skyrocketed in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. The analysis employs a series of variables that represent the development of e-government and the digitization of public procedures and uses a series of econometric models to detect their impact on (the perceived) c orruption, the rule of law and competitiveness in different member-countrie s of the European Union. These variables express the perceptions of citizens of different European Union countries with respect to digitized public services. The data come from the public databases of the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the United Nations and Eurostat and cover the period 2007-2021. The study provides evidence that e-government and the use of public internet to interact with the public authorities exert significant positive impact on competitiveness at all model specifications; the use of public internet to interact with the public authorities posts significant positive influence on (the fight against) corruption at all models; and the information and communication technology access for business has significant positive effect on the rule of law in the model specifications that use foreign direct investment inflows or outflows as control variables. In contrast the positive impact of e-government on (the fight against) corruption is not statistically significant, whereas its impact on the rule of law was found to be statistically significant and negative. These findings can be of value to the policy makers across the European Union countries as they can at least secure the digitization of the transactions of the citizens with the state, as well as the digital transition of the enterprises as a means to decrease corruption, increase competitiveness and improve the rule of law.
Abu-Shanab, E. A. (2016). Global Competitiveness Improvement: E-Government as a Tool. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 7, 111. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.3.655
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are Emerging Technologies Helping win the Fight against Corruption? A Review of the State of Evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, Article ID: 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Afonasova, M. A., Panfilova, E. E., Galichkina, M. A., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2019). Digitalization in Economy and Innovation: The Effect on Social and Economic Processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.02
Ali, M., Raza, S. A., Puah, C. H., & Arsalan, T. (2021). Does e-Government Control Corruption? Evidence from South Asian Countries. Journal of Financial Crime, 29, 258-271. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2021-0003
Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2021). E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14, 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015
Androniceanu, A., Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2022). Public Administration Digitalization and Corruption in the EU Member States. A Comparative and Correlative Research Analysis. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 18, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.65E.1
Androniceanu, A., Kinnunen, J., & Georgescu, I. (2020). E-Government Clusters in the EU Based on the Gaussian Mixture Models. Administratiesi Management Public, 35, 6-20. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2020.35-01
Apostolopoulos, N., Psychalis, M., Liargovas, P., & Pistikou, V. (2022). Investigating Government Lending during an Economic Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of Four EU Countries. European Politics and Society, 23, 548-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1895558
Bennett, S., Durana, P., & Konecny, V. (2020). Urban Internet of Things Systems and Interconnected Sensor Networks in Sustainable Smart City Governance. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 12, 51-57. https://doi.org/10.22381/GHIR12220206
Castro, C., & Lopes, I. C. (2022). E-Government as a Tool in Controlling Corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2076695
Davis, R. (2015, September). eGovernment—Using Technology to Improve Public Services and Democratic Participation. European Parliamentary Research Service. Members’ Research Service. September 2015 PE 565.890. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/565890/EPRS_IDA(2015)565890_EN.pdf
Gronlund, A., & Horan, T. A. (2005). Introducing e-gov: History, Definitions, and Issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 713-729. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01539
Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 71-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00133
Kaufmann, D. (2005). Myths and Realities of Governance and Corruption. MPRA Paper No. 8089. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8089 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.829244
Klitgaard, R. (2000). Subverting Corruption. Finance and Development, 37, 2.
Lincaru, C., Pirciog, S., Grigorescu, A., & Tudose, G. (2018). Low-Low (LL) High Human Capital Clusters in Public Administration Employment-Predictor for Digital Infrastructure Public Investment Priority-Romania Case Study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6, 729. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(18)
Linhartová, V. (2017). The Role of e-Government in Mitigating Corruption. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration.
Lupu, D., & Lazăr, C. G. (2015). Influence of e-Government on the Level of Corruption in Some EU and Non-EU States. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00085-4
Manoharan, A. (2013). A Three Dimensional Assessment of US County e-Government. State and Local Government Review, 45, 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X13494858
Mirzazadeh, I. (2021). The Nexus between Corruption and the Rule of Law. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3962744 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3962744
Munger, M. C. (2018). On the Contingent Vice of Corruption. Social Philosophy and Policy, 35, 158-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052519000153
OECD (2022). https://stats.oecd.org
Park, C. H., & Kim, K. (2020). E-Government as an Anti-Corruption Tool: Panel Data Analysis across Countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86, 691-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318822055
Poufinas, T. (2022). Fixed Income Investing—A Classic in a Time of Increased Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87922-8
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 599-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118402
Ślusarczyk, B., & Ul Haque, A. (2019). Public Services for Business Environment: Challenges for Implementing Industry 4.0 in Polish and Canadian Logistic Enterprises. Administration & Public Management Review, No. 33, 57-76. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2019.33-04.
Thanh, H. T. T., & Kim, P. S. (2016). The Impact of e-Government on Competitiveness-Based Economic Growth in Vietnam. Southeast Asia Journal, 26, 59-98. https://doi.org/10.21485/hufsea.2016.26.2.003
Transparency International (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index 2021. https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2021_Report_EN-web.pdf
Ulman, S. R. (2013). Corruption and National Competitiveness in Different Stages of Country Development. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00127-5
United Nations (2002, May). Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration.
United Nations (2012). The Future We Want—Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 27 July 2012. In General Assembly. A/RES/66/288. Sixty-Sixth Session, Agenda Item 19 (pp. 1-53). The General Assembly. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_66_288.pdf
United Nations (2022). Department of Economic and Social Affairs—Public Institutions. https://publicadministration.un.org/en
United States Department of Agriculture (2002). E-Government (E-Gov). https://www.usda.gov/ocio/centers/irmc/e-government
Wacker, T., Bolliger, M., & Seimen, M. (2020). Green Bond Slide Pack. UBS. https://www.ubs.com
World Bank (The) (2015, May 19). e-Government Brief. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/brief/e-government
World Bank (The) (2022). World Bank Data—Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
Zhao, H., Ahn, M. J., & Manoharan, A. P. (2021). E-Government, Corruption Reduction and the Role of Culture: A Study Based on Panel Data of 57 Countries. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 10, 86-104. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.20210701.oa6