This paper aims to restate, in a decision theory framework, the results of some significant contributions of the literature on probability discounting that followed the publication of the pioneering article by Rachlin et al. We provide a restatement of probability discounting, usually limited to the case of 2-issues lotteries, in terms of rank-dependent utility, in which the utilities of the outcomes of n -issues lotteries are weighted by probabilities transformed after their transposition into time-delays. This formalism makes the typical cases of rationality in time and in risk mutually exclusive, but allows looser types of rationality. The resulting attitude toward probability and toward risk are then determined in relation to the values of the two parameters involved in the procedure of probability discounting: a parameter related to impatience and pessimism, and a parameter related to time-consistency and the separation between non-optimism and non-pessimism. A simulation illustrates these results through the characteristics of the transformation of probabilities function.
KeywordsProbability DiscountingTime DiscountingLogarithmic Time PerceptionRank-Dependent UtilityRationalityAttitude Toward ProbabilitiesAttitude Toward Risk
Abdellaoui, M. (2009). Rank-Dependent Utility. In P. Anand, P. K. Pattanaik, & C. Puppe (Eds.), Rational and Social Choice: An Overview of New Foundations and Applications (pp. 69-89). Oxford University Press.
Bergeot, J., & Jusot, F. (2024). Risk, Time Preferences, Trustworthiness and COVID-19 Preventive Behavior: Evidence from France. The European Journal of Health Economics, 25, 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-023-01573-y
Cajueiro, D. O. (2006). A Note on the Relevance of the Q-Exponential Function in the Context of Intertemporal Choices. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 364, 385-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2005.08.056
Chateauneuf, A. (1999). Comonotonicity Axioms and Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Theory for Arbitrary Consequences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 32, 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4068(98)00032-9
Chateauneuf, A., & Cohen, M. (1994). Risk Seeking with Diminishing Marginal Utility in a Non-Expected Utility Model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01073404
Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., & Meilijson, I. (2005). More Pessimism than Greediness: A Characterization of Monotone Risk Aversion in the Rank-Dependent Expected Utility Model. Economic Theory, 25, 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-003-0451-7
Cohen, M. (2015). Risk Perception, Risk Attitude, and Decision: A Rank-Dependent Analysis. Mathematical Population Studies, 22, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/08898480.2013.836425
Cohen, M. D. (1995). Risk-Aversion Concepts in Expected-and Non-Expected-Utility Models. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 20, 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01098959
Cruz Rambaud, S., & Muñoz Torrecillas, M. J. (2013). A Generalization of the-Exponential Discounting Function. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 392, 3045-3050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.03.009
Dehaene, S. (2003). The Neural Basis of the Weber-Fechner Law: A Logarithmic Mental Number Line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00055-x
Diecidue, E., & Wakker, P. P. (2001). On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011877808366
Fishburn, P. C., & Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time Preference. International Economic Review, 23, 677-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/2526382
Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 129-166. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0710
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A Discounting Framework for Choice with Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769-792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
Herrnstein, R. (1981). Self-Control as Response Strength. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of Steady-State Operant Behavior (page). Elsevier/North-Holland.
Hong, C. S., Karni, E., & Safra, Z. (1987). Risk Aversion in the Theory of Expected Utility with Rank Dependent Probabilities. Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 370-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(87)90093-7
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica , 47, 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 573-597. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118482
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An Adjusting Procedure for Studying Delayed Reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Be- havior (Vol. 5), The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value (pp. 55-73). Erlbaum.
Munoz Torrecillas, M. J., Takahashi, T., Gil Roales-Nieto, J., Cruz Rambaud, S., Callejón Ruiz, Z., & Torrecillas Jover, B. (2018). Impatience and Inconsistency in Intertemporal Choice: An Experimental Analysis. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19, 190-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2017.1374274
Ostaszewski, P., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (1998). Effects of Inflation on the Subjective Value of Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 324-333. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212959
Prelec, D. (1998). The Probability Weighting Function. Econometrica , 66, 497-527. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998573
Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1991). Decision Making over Time and under Uncertainty: A Common Approach. Management Science, 37, 770-786. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.7.770
Quiggin, J. (1982). A Theory of Anticipated Utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90008-7
Quiggin, J. (1992). Increasing Risk: Another Definition. In A. Chikan (Ed.), Progress in Decision, Utility and Risk Theory (pp. 239-248). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3146-9_21
Rachlin, H., & Siegel, E. (1994). Temporal Patterning in Probabilistic Choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1054
Rachlin, H., Brown, J., & Cross, D. (2000). Discounting in Judgments of Delay and Probability. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200004/06)13:2<145::aid-bdm320>3.0.co;2-4
Rachlin, H., Logue, A. W., Gibbon, J., & Frankel, M. (1986). Cognition and Behavior in Studies of Choice. Psychological Review, 93, 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.93.1.33
Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). SUBJECTIVE probability and Delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.55-233
Rachlin, H., Siegel, E., & Cross, D. (1994). Lotteries and the Time Horizon. Psychological Science, 5, 390-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00291.x
Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing Risk: I. A Definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(70)90038-4
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social Learning and Clinical Psychology . Prentice-Hall.
Scrogin, D. (2023). Estimating Risk and Time Preferences over Public Lotteries: Findings from the Field and Stream. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 67, 73-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-023-09404-4
Somasundaram, J., & Eli, V. (2022). Risk and Time Preferences Interaction: An Experimental Measurement. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 65, 215-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-022-09394-9
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the Psychophysical Law. Psychological Review, 64, 153-181. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046162
Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of Self-Control in Intertemporal Choice May Be Attributable to Logarithmic Time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65, 691-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2005.04.040
Takahashi, T. (2007a). A Comparison of Intertemporal Choices for Oneself versus Someone Else Based on Tsallis’ Statistics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 385, 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.020
Takahashi, T. (2007b). A Probabilistic Choice Model Based on Tsallis’ Statistics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 386, 335-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.07.005
Takahashi, T. (2008). A Comparison between Tsallis’s Statistics-Based and Generalized Quasi-Hyperbolic Discount Models in Humans. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387, 551-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.09.007
Takahashi, T. (2010). A Social Discounting Model Based on Tsallis’ Statistics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 389, 3600-3603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.020
Takahashi, T. (2011). Psychophysics of the Probability Weighting Function. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390, 902-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.10.004
Takahashi, T. (2013). The q -Exponential Social Discounting Functions of Gain and Loss. Applied Mathematics, 4, 445-448. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.43066
Takahashi, T., Han, R., & Nakamura, F. (2012). Time Discounting: Psychophysics of Inter-temporal and Probabilistic Choices. Journal of Behavioral Economics and Finance, 5, 10-14.
Takahashi, T., Han, R., Nishinaka, H., Makino, T., & Fukui, H. (2013). The q -Exponential Probability Discounting of Gain and Loss. Applied Mathematics, 4, 876-881. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.46120
Tsallis, C. (1994). What Are the Numbers that Experiments Provide? Quimica Nova, 17, 468-471.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122574
Wakker, P. (1994). Separating Marginal Utility and Probabilistic Risk Aversion. Theory and Decision, 36, 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01075296
Wakker, P. P. (2010). Prospect Theory : For Risk and Ambiguity . Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511779329
Yaari, M. E. (1987). The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk. Econometrica , 55, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911158
Yi, R., de la Piedad, X., & Bickel, W. K. (2006). The Combined Effects of Delay and Probability in Discounting. Behavioural Processes, 73, 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.05.001