On Intersectionalities and Employer Concerns in the Context of Becker’s Model of Discrimination
- 1 Department of Professional and Graduate Studies in Business, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, NC, USA
Abstract
Becker’s (1957, 1971) theory of discrimination set the stage for much of the literature on discrimination and disparities in labor markets over the last half-century. While the simplifying assumptions of Becker’s model are hardly descriptive of real labor markets, the model still provides a reference framework for an examination of group-based wage differentials. In that context, this paper examines how different assumptions about the nature of Becker’s discriminatory coefficient and about employer concerns would affect the predictions of Becker’s model. In particular, intersectional concerns and employment screening would make employment decisions far more complex than Becker’s original model suggests. Most importantly, employers are likely to look beyond larger ethnic and racial groups in their hiring decisions. As a result, based on intersectional issues, we might see some members of a minority group face a positive discriminatory coefficient while other members of the same group might face a negative one.
- Akerlof, G. A. (1982). Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 543-569. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885099
- Ang, D. (2021). Labor Market Discrimination. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Working Paper.
- Arrow, K. J. (1973). The Theory of Discrimination. In O. Ashenfelter, & A. Rees (Eds.), Discrimination in Labor Markets (pp. 3-42). Princeton University Press.
- Becker, G. S. (1957). The Economics of Discrimination. University of Chicago Press.
- Becker, G. S. (1971). The Economics of Discrimination (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
- Bolte, L., Jackson, M. O., & Immorlica, N. (2020). The Role of Referrals in Immobility, Inequality, and Inefficiency in Labor Markets. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512293
- Brymer, R. A., & Rocha, V. (2024). Affiliation‐Based Hiring in Startups and the Origins of Organizational Diversity. Personnel Psychology, 77, 23-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12612
- Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
- Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex (pp. 139-166). Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3007
- Elster, J. (1983). Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139171694
- Fernandez, R. M., & Greenberg, J. (2013). Race, Network Hiring, and Statistical Discrimination. In S. Mcdonald (Ed.), Networks, Work and Inequality (pp. 81-102). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0277-2833(2013)0000024007
- Glastonbury, C. M., Bucknor, M., Wall, S. D., & Hess, C. P. (2021). Hiring through the Lens of Diversity: Strategies to Create Diverse Departments. Academic Radiology, 28, 1775-1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.007
- Jonsson, P. O. (2001). Networks, Culture, Transaction Costs and Discrimination. International Journal of Social Economics, 28, 942-958. https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000006134
- Jonsson, P. O. (2011). On Utilitarianism vs Virtue Ethics as Foundations of Economic Choice Theory. Humanomics, 27, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661111110150