Incoming information brings in news which could be neutral, good, or bad. However, the brain and the body’s response to bad news is much stronger and sustained. Bad news may trigger the human stress-response system which creates a chemical bath in both the brain and the body. In particular, the stress hormone, cortisol, is released, which provides a quick boost of energy to the body and the brain. However, repeated or continuous exposure to cortisol exacts substantial costs on both the brain and the body. We argue that it is implausible to assume that the brain, which ultimately is the seat of all decision-making, completely ignores all such costs. In this article, we show that the inclusion of such costs provides a unified explanation for the Allais paradox and the Ellsberg paradox and makes predictions that are empirically supported. We further show that such costs potentially contribute to high and countercyclical equity-premia.
Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2012). Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences. American Economic Review, 102, 3357-3376. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3357
Bleichrodt, H., & Wakker, P. (2015). Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives. The Economic Journal, 125, 493-532. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12200
Camerer, C. F. (1992). Recent Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory. In W. Edwards (Ed.), Utility: Theories, Measurement, and Applications (pp. 207-251). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2952-7_9
Cochrane, J. H. (2017). Macro-Finance. Review of Finance, 21, 945-985. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfx010
Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Wu, G. (2006). The Uncertainty Effect: When a Risky Prospect Is Valued Less than Its Worst Possible Outcome. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 1283-1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.4.1283
Godoy, L., Rossignoli, L., Delfino-Pereira, P., Garcia-Cairasco, N., & Umeoka, E. (2018). A Comprehensive Overview on Stress Neurobiology: Basic Concepts and Clinical Implications. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, Article 127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00127
Guidi, J., Lucente, M., Sonino, N., & Fava, G. (2021). Allostatic Load and Its Impact on Health: A Systematic Review. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 90, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510696
Harless, D. W., & Camerer, C. F. (1994). The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories. Econometrica, 62, 1251-1289. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951749
Huck, S., & Müller, W. (2012). Allais for All: Revisiting the Paradox in a Large Representative Sample. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 261-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-012-9142-8
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Machina, M. J., & Siniscalchi, M. (2014). Ambiguity and Ambiguity Aversion. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty , 1, 729-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53685-3.00013-1
Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2011). Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 373-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq004
Penberthy, J. K. (2022). Regret Can Be All Consuming—A Neuro Behavioral Scientist Explains How People Can Overcome It . The Conversation.
Seiler, A., Fagundes, C. P., & Christian, L. M. (2020). The Impact of Everyday Stressors on the Immune System and Health. In A. Choukèr (Ed.), Stress Challenges and Immunity in Space (pp. 71-92). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16996-1_6
Serfilippi, E., Carter, M., & Guirkinger, C. (2019). Insurance Contracts When Individuals “Greatly Value” Certainty: Results from a Field Experiment in Burkina Faso. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 731-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.07.017
Siddiqi, H. (2009). Is the Lure of Choice Reflected in Market Prices? Experimental Evidence Based on the 4-Door Monty Hall Problem. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.07.004
Siddiqi, H. (2011). The Relevance of Thinking-By-Analogy for Investors’ Willingness-To-Pay: An Experimental Study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.08.008
Siddiqi, H. (2017). Certain and Uncertain Utility: A New Perspective on Financial Innovation. Economics Letters, 158, 7-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.009
Siddiqi, H. (2024a). Information Processing in the Brain and Financial Innovations. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 25, 410-419. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2023.2198718
Siddiqi, H. (2024b). Strict Certainty Preference in the Predictive Brain: A New Perspective on Financial Innovations and Their Role in the Real Economy. Annals of Finance, 20, 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-024-00444-7
Siddiqi, H., & Murphy, A. (2023). The Resource-Constrained Brain: A New Perspective on the Equity Premium Puzzle. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 24, 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2021.1975716
Soroka, S., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, Politics, and Negativity. Political Communication, 32, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.881942
Soroka, S., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2019). Cross-national Evidence of a Negativity Bias in Psychophysiological Reactions to News. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 18888-18892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 332-382. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.2.332
Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2015). Ambiguity Attitudes. In G. Keren, & G. Wu (Eds.), Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, II (pp. 48-72). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468333.ch3
Yaribegi, H., Panahi, Y., Sahraei, H., Johnston, T., & Sahiubkar, A. (2017). The Impact of Stress on Body Function: A Review. EXCLI Journal, 16, 1057-1072.