Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Note on Timing of Endogenous Wage Bargaining: The Case of Complements
Graduate School of International Studies, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea
Division of Global Finance and Banking, Inha University, Incheon, Korea
- 1 Graduate School of International Studies, Pusan National University, Pusan, Korea
- 2 Division of Global Finance and Banking, Inha University, Incheon, Korea
Theoretical Economics Letters·Volume 03 (2013)·Pages 28–37·Published 26 February 2013·DOI10.4236/tel.2013.31005
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
By introducing Cournot and Bertrand competition in adifferentiated goods with the case of complements into Nash bargaining solution problem, we investigate timing of endogenous wage setting where wages can be negotiated either simultaneously or sequentially. Contrary to the case of substitutes, we show that regardless of the bargaining power, the type of product market competition (Cournot or Bertrand) and the degree of complementarity, 1) bargaining over wages is always simultaneous when the goods are complements; and 2) the social welfare under both Cournot and Bertrand competitions can improve when bargaining over wages is simultaneous.
KeywordsBargainingComplementsCournot-Bertrand CompetitionSocial Welfare
- K. Brekke and O.R. Straume, “Bilateral Monopolies and Location Choice,” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2004, pp. 275-288. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00046-2
- J. C. Barcena-Ruiz and F. J. Casado-Izaga, “Timing in Endogenous Bargaining over Costs and Firm Location,” Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 2, 2008, pp. 149-166. doi:10.1007/s00712-008-0026-y
- H. Horn and A. Wolinsky, “Bilateral Monopolies and Incentives for Merger,” Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 3, 1988, pp. 408-419. doi:10.2307/2555664
- J. C. Barcena-Ruiz and M. B. Garzon, “The Organisation of Wage Bargaining in Divisionalised Firms,” Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2002, pp. 305-319. doi:10.1111/1467-8454.00166
- G. De Fraja, “Staggered vs Synchronized Wage Setting in Oligopoly,” European Economic Review, Vol. 37, 1993, pp. 1507-1522. doi:10.1016/0014-2921(93)90119-U
- G. Corneo, “National Wage Bargaining in an International Integrated Product Markets,” European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1995, pp. 503-520. doi:10.1016/0176-2680(95)00006-J
- C. Davidson, “Multiunit Bargaining in Oligopolistic Industries,” Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1988, pp. 397-422. doi:10.1086/298189
- R, A. Naylor, “Industry Profits and Competition under Bilateral Oligopoly,” Economics Letters, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2002, pp. 169-175. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00107-6
- S. Dorwrick, “Union-Oligopoly Bargaining,” Economic Journal, Vol. 99, No. 398, 1989, pp. 1123-1142. doi:10.2307/2234092
- H. Horn and A. Wolinsky, “Worker Substitutability and Patterns of Unionization,” Economic Journal, Vol. 98, 1988, pp. 484-497. doi:10.2307/2233379
- K. E. Lommerud, F. Meland and L. Sorgard, “Unionised Oligopoly, Trade Liberalisation and Location Choice,” Economic Journal, Vol. 113, No. 490, 2003, pp. 782-800. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.t01-1-00154
- K. Choi, “Timing of Endogenous Wage Setting and Privatization in a Differentiated Industry: A Mixed-Duopoly Approach,” Mimeo, Pusan National University, Pusan, 2009.
- J. C. Barcena-Ruiz and M. L. Campo, “R&D Investment and Sequential Wage Negotiation,” Australian Economic Papers, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2009, pp. 183-202. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8454.2009.00370.x
- A. Booth, “The Economics of the Trade Union,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.