Welfare Perceptions of Public Expenditure on Environmental and Non-Environmental Goods
- 1 Division of Economics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- 2 Division of Economics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Abstract
Increasing research shows that income growth has a less than substantial impact on people’s well-being. In contrast, environmental factors are found to have non-negligible impact on people’s well-being. The research raises the question of whether more can be done to improve the well-being of the public through government spending on the environment. We conducted pair comparison surveys using the variance stable rank method on preferences for public expenditure on education, environment and transportation in Singapore. Both aggregate preference rankings as well as rank ordered logitregression analysis on individuals’ rankings reveal that respondents perceive larger improvements in well-being from increasing public expenditure on environment goods compared to an equivalent increase in public expenditure on education goods.
- Diener, E., Diener, M. and Diener, C. (1995) Factors Predicting the Subjective Well-Being of Nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 851-864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851
- Easterlin, R. (1974) Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence” In: David, R. and Reder, R., Eds., Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz, Academic Press, New York.
- Easterlin, R.A. (2005) A Puzzle for Adaptive Theory. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 56, 513-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.03.003
- Oswald, A.J. (1997) Happiness and Economic Performance. Economic Journal, 107, 1815-1831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00085.x
- Ng, Y.K. (2001) Is Public Spending Good for You? World Economics, 2, 1-17.
- Ng, Y.K. (2008) Environmentally Responsible Happy Nation Index: Towards an Internationally Acceptable National Success Indicator. Social Indicators Research, 85, 425-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9135-1
- Quah, E. and Tan, K.C. (2002) Siting Environmentally Unwanted Facilities: Risks, Trade-Offs and Choices. Edward Elgar Publishers, Aldershot.
- Welsch, H. (2002) Preferences over Prosperity and Pollution: Environmental Valuation Based on Happiness Surveys. Kyklos, 55, 473-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00198
- Welsch, H. (2006) Environment and Happiness: Valuation of Air Pollution Using Life Satisfaction Data. Ecological Economics, 58, 801-813. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.006
- Rehdanz, K. and Maddison, D. (2005) Climate and Happiness. Ecological Economics, 52, 111-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.015
- Peterson, G. and Brown, T. (1998) Economic Valuation by the Method of Paired Comparison, with Emphasis on Evaluation of the Transitivity Axiom. Land Economics, 74, 240-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3147054
- Shin, D. and Johnson, D. (1978) Avowed Happiness as an Overall Assessment of the Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00352944
- Compton, W.C. (2005) An Introduction to Positive Psychology. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont.
- Suh, E., Diener, E., Oishi, S. and Triandis, H. (1998) The Shifting Basis of Life Satisfaction Judgments across Cultures: Emotions versus Norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.482