Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Common-Value Procurement Auctions with Renegotiation
Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, USA
Universidad Fransisco Marroquín, Guatemala City, Guatemala
- 1 Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, USA
- 2 Universidad Fransisco Marroquín, Guatemala City, Guatemala
Theoretical Economics Letters·Volume 04 (2014)·Pages 619–622·Published 7 October 2014·DOI10.4236/tel.2014.48078
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This note contains the equilibrium bid functions for two types of common-value procurement auctions: 1) a procurement auction in which bids represent an enforceable contract; 2) a procurement auction in which, upon learning the true cost of supplying the good, the winning bidder can renegotiate the contract with the buyer, and each bidder must submit a bond with their bid, which is returned at the end of the auction unless they are the low bidder and renegotiate the contract.
KeywordsProcurement AuctionsRenegotiationBiddingEquilibrium
- Milgrom, P.R. and Weber, R.J. (1982) A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding. Econometrica, 50, 1089-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1911865
- Guasch, J.L., Laffont, J.J. and Straub, S. (2008) Renegotiation of Concession Contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the Water and Transport Sectors. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 421-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2007.05.003
- Wang, R. (2000) Bidding and Renegotiation in Procurement Auctions. European Economic Review, 44, 1577-1597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00082-8
- Roelofs, M.R. (2002) Common Value Auctions with Default: An Experimental Approach. Experimental Economics, 5, 233-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020840420643
- Kagel, J.H. and Levin, D. (2002) Common Value Auctions and the Winner’s Curse. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.