Corporate Social Responsibility from the Viewpoint of Social Risk
- 1 Department of Business, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- 2 Department of Business, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
- 3 Department of Business, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
Abstract
This paper studies Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) from the viewpoint of social risk as part of reputational risk. We adopt the conception of social risk that includes the risks originated by environmental and social sustainability. Any risk involves hazards and opportunities. The success of its management consists of hedging the hazards and turning opportunities into value. CSR is the key for dealing with both goals. Opportunities can be identified through an accurate analysis that leads to discovering the unsatisfied needs contained in societal claims in general and in the private politics of Non Governmental Organizations (NGO) in particular. Bringing these opportunities into line with the corporate know-how and undertaking projects together with the stakeholders with whom synergy is possible enables corporations to create shared value. A direct hedging of social risk hazards is hardly impossible. A good corporate social image constitutes a sound hedging against social risk. We have associated to social image the concept of CSR capital which means the value created through CSR. On this basis, we analyze the meaning and implications of social failure using Leland’s bankruptcy costs model. The quantification of the CSR capital may parallel the quantification of reputational capital about which several papers have been published. Combining the direct net present value created by a CSR expense with its tax savings and the savings it produces in the present value of the social failure costs, we estimate the total net present value created by these expenses. The analysis of social failure costs and the value created by social expenses is accompanied by a numerical illustration.
- Bernstein (1998) Against the Gods. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- United Nations (2014) UN Global Compact. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/AboutTheGC/index.html
- United Nations (2011) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/121/90/PDF/G1112190.pdf?OpenElement
- McCorquodale, R. (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 385-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0296-5
- Lee, D.E. and Lee E.J. (2010) Human Rights and the Ethics of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778148
- Credit Suisse (2014) Risk Categories. https://www.credit-suisse.com/media/cc/docs/investors/risk/risk.pdf
- Soprano, A., Crielaard, B., Piacenza, F. and Ruspantini, D. (2009) Measuring Operational and Reputational Risks. John Wiley &Sons, Chichester.
- Stansfield, G. (2006) Some Thoughts on Reputation and Challenges for Global Financial Institutions. Geneva Papers on Risk & Insurance, 31, 470-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510087
- Bekefi, T., Jenkings, B. and Kytle, B. (2006) Social Risk as Strategic Risk. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper No. 30. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
- Orlitzky, M. and Benjamin, J. D. (2001) Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review. Business and Society, 40, 369-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000402
- Baron, D.P. (2001) Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 10, 7-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/105864001300122548
- Schepers, D.H. (2006) The Impact of NGO Network Conflict on the Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies of Multinational Corporations. Business and Society, 45, 282-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650306289386
- Kitzmueller, M. and Shimshack, J. (2012) Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50, 51-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.1.51
- Baron, D.P. (2009) A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18, 7-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00206.x