Contribution of Education and Innovation to Productivity among Mexican Regions: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis
- 1 Facultad de Economía, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila Unidad Camporredondo, Saltillo, Mexico
- 2 Centro de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas (CISE), Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila Unidad Camporredondo, Saltillo, Mexico
Abstract
A dynamic panel data (DPD) model is estimated to assess the contribution of the average schooling years, the education expenditure and the inventive coefficient—as an approximation for innovation—to the increased productivity of the Mexican states. The potential difficulties of endogeneity and serial correlation are controlled by adopting system General Method of Moments (GMM) procedures. The findings are compatible with the theory. The importance of the lags is confirmed and the positive and significant impacts on productivity tend to vary according to the income level and the geographical location of the regions. Innovation is an important contributor to northern, central and richer states’ productivity, but education expenditure is important for the poorer states and scholarly attainment stands out in the southern states. The analysis emerging from the model concludes that these regional differences should be seen as a potential opportunity for designing customized policies capable of increasing the productivity and not as a weakness.
- Becker, G. (1962) Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/258724
- Schultz, T. (1963) Economic Value of Education. Columbia University Press, New York.
- Chevalier, A., Harmon, C., Walker, I. and Zhu, Y. (2004) Does Education Raise Productivity, or Just Reflect It? The Economic Journal, 114, F499-F517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00256.x
- Paus, E.A. (2004) Productivity Growth in Latin America: The Limits of Neoliberal Reforms. World Development, 32, 427-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.05.002
- Power, D. and Malmberg, A. (2008) The Contribution of Universities to Innovation and Economic Development: In What Sense a Regional Problem? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1, 233-245.
- Kaldor, N. and Mirrless, J.A. (1962) A New Model of Economic Growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 29, 174-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2295953
- Crespi, F. and Pianta, M. (2008) Demand and Innovation in Productivity Growth. International Review of Applied Economics, 22, 655-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02692170802407429
- Pencavel, J. (1991) Higher Education, Productivity, and Earnings: A Review. Journal of Economic Education, 22, 331-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1991.10844727
- Mayhew, K. and Neely, A. (2006) Improving Productivity—Opening the Black Box. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22, 445-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj026
- Vieira, E., Neira, I. and Vázquez, E. (2011) Productivity and Innovation Economy: Comparative Analysis of European NUTS-2, 1995-2004. Regional Studies, 45, 1269-1286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.486781
- AlAzzawi, S. (2012) Innovation, Productivity and Foreign Direct Investment-Induced R&D Spillovers. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 21, 615-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2010.513056
- Harris, R., Li, Q.C. and Moffat, J. (2013) The Impact of Higher Institution-Firm Knowledge Links on Establishment-Level Productivity in British Regions. The Manchester School, 81, 143-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.2011.02276.x
- German-Soto, V., Gutiérrez, L. and Tovar Montiel, S.H. (2009) Factores y relevancia geográfica del proceso de innovación regional en México, 1994-2006. Estudios Económicos, 24, 225-248.